| 程志强,李庚,杜承宸.文献伪引类型、动机和防范对策.编辑学报,2025,37(1):60-64 |
| 文献伪引类型、动机和防范对策 |
| Analysis of types,motivations,and prevention measures for literature false citation |
| |
| DOI：10.16811/j.cnki.1001-4314.2025.01.013 |
| 中文关键词: 文献伪引 期刊评价 防范对策 |
| 英文关键词: literature false citation journal evaluation preventionmeasure |
| 基金项目: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 4 |
| 全文下载次数: 20 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 文献引用中常出现伪引,会对学术环境、期刊评价与管理等产生负面影响。为此,本文从类型、动机和防范对策等方面对伪引行为进行综合分析。结果表明,伪引主要表现为曲引、转引、自引、盲引和互引等形式,伪引原因主要是为提高期刊和个人引证指标或对引用规范不熟悉,防范伪引需要充分认识伪引负面影响、理性对待引文评价机制、严格履行核查把关责任和建立参考文献审查模式等。通过对伪引行为进行综合分析,以期为系统认识和防范伪引提供参考。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| False citation, a prevalent issue in academic literature citation, adversely affects the scholarly environment, journal assessment, and administrative practices. Consequently, we undertake a comprehensive examination of false citation behavior, scrutinizing its types, motivations, and preventive measures. Our findings reveal that false citations primarily encompass distorted citations, citations of secondary references, self-citations, blind citations, and mutual citations. The primary motivations for engaging in false citation practices stem from the desire to enhance journal and personal citation metrics, coupled with an inadequate understanding of citation norms. To mitigate false citations, it is imperative to fully grasp their detrimental effects, approach citation evaluation mechanisms with rationality, rigorously scrutinize citations, and establish a reference review model. This comprehensive analysis of false citation behavior offers insights into systematically understanding and preventing such practices. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|
