文章摘要
于荣利,张琳,郭佳宏,朱丽娜.科技期刊编辑出版过程提升作者配合度的策略.编辑学报,2025,37(1):115-118
科技期刊编辑出版过程提升作者配合度的策略
Strategies for improving authors’ cooperation in scientific journal publishing
  
DOI:10.16811/j.cnki.1001-4314.2025.01.024
中文关键词: 作者配合度  不当署名  学术诚信体系建设  简化投稿  定制化退修  引导审读  有效沟通
英文关键词: author cooperation  improper attribution  construction of academic integrity system  simplify submission  personalized revision service  guiding review  effective communication
基金项目:*2024年度中国农业期刊网研究基金项目(CAJW2024-073,CAJW2024-085) 
作者单位
于荣利 上海市农业科学院,上海 201106 
张琳 上海市农业科学院,上海 201106 
郭佳宏 上海市农业科学院,上海 201106 
朱丽娜 上海市农业科学院,上海 201106 
摘要点击次数: 6
全文下载次数: 22
中文摘要:
      在科技期刊编辑出版过程中,需要编辑、作者之间配合、互动,但同时编辑与作者间的博弈也时有发生。作者配合度直接影响稿件加工质量和期刊出版效率。在总结科技期刊投稿、退修、校对、数字化传播等环节中常见的作者不配合类型及产生原因的基础上,提出提升作者配合度的4种策略:1)投稿环节。通过前期引导、严审重罚,使作者清楚认识到触碰学术不端红线后果严重;同时部分信息填报后移,简化投稿程序,使作者容易规范投稿。2)退修环节。以卓越的编辑职业素养和人格魅力感召作者,赢得作者信任与尊重;提供定制化退修服务,协同作者高效返修。3)校样环节。完善校对流程、细化审读要求,明确任务内容与要求,引导作者审读到位。4)数字化传播环节。示范引导、稿酬评优并举,调动作者参与积极性。
英文摘要:
      In the publishing process of scientific journals, seamless interaction and cooperation between editors and authors are indispensable. However, discrepancies frequently arise between them. The level of cooperation from authors significantly impacts the quality of manuscript processing and the efficiency of journal publication. To enhance authors’cooperation, this study summarizes the typical instances of non-cooperation during the stages of submission, revision, proofreading, and digital dissemination, and delves into the underlying reasons. To improve authors’ cooperation, the following strategies are proposed:1)enhancing authors’ academic integrity by offering guidance during the submission stage, making them acutely aware of the severe repercussions of academic misconduct through stringent penalties, and streamlining the submission process by deferring certain information-filling tasks; 2)inspiring authors through editors’ professionalism and personal charisma, and providing tailored revision services during the revision stage; 3)optimizing the proofreading process and guiding authors to meticulously review their proofs by refining proofreading requirements during the proofreading stage; 4)encouraging authors’ participation by combining demonstrative guidance with remuneration incentives during the digital dissemination stage.
查看全文   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭