| 王海霞,李晶晶,陈咏梅,王景周,丛敏,吴春燕,张齐好,陈林.科技期刊出版伦理审查清单的制订与应用.编辑学报,2025,37(3):283-289 |
| 科技期刊出版伦理审查清单的制订与应用 |
| Formulation and application of the publishing ethics review checklist for scientific and technical periodicals |
| |
| DOI：10.16811/j.cnki.1001-4314.2025.03.009 |
| 中文关键词: 科技期刊 出版伦理审查 清单管理 科研诚信 科技伦理 |
| 英文关键词: scientific and technical periodicals publishing ethics review checklist management scientific research integrity scientific and technological ethics |
| 基金项目:*广东省科技计划项目-广东省科技期刊优秀人才项目(2024B1212110008,2024B1212110006)；中央高校基本科研业务费项目(21624807) |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 140 |
| 全文下载次数: 139 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 在预警和防范科研失信行为中,科技期刊的出版伦理审查措施可发挥重要作用,建立规范化的出版伦理审查制度具有必要性。目前,因缺乏规范的指引,开展出版伦理审查的科技期刊较少,且存在审查制度不健全、不透明,审查项目不全面,审查标准主观随意等问题。本研究针对科研全流程的关键伦理问题,构建了全面系统的出版伦理审查清单框架,设立了作者自查与编辑、专家复核相结合的多维审查机制。采用出版伦理审查清单开展伦理审查的初步结果显示,其可规范化审查流程,减少主观评判偏差；条理化审查项目,突出伦理关键要素；透明化审查标准,明确主体职责。本研究设计的审查清单可作为一种简单实用的伦理审查工具供同行参考使用。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| The publishing ethics review measures implemented by scientific and technical periodicals serve as a supervisory mechanism for early warning and prevention of research misconduct, underscoring the necessity to establish standardized review protocols. Currently, the absence of standardized guidelines has resulted in limited adoption of publishing ethics reviews among scientific and technical periodicals, with common issues including inadequate or opaque review systems, incomplete evaluation criteria, and overly subjective or arbitrary review standards. This study proposes a comprehensive framework for a publishing ethics review checklist by addressing critical ethical concerns throughout the entire research lifecycle. It establishes a multi-dimensional review mechanism integrating author self-assessment with editorial and expert evaluations. Preliminary implementation of the review checklist demonstrates its capacity to:1) standardize review workflows while mitigating subjective judgment biases; 2) systematize evaluation items and emphasize key ethical components; and 3) enhance transparency of review criteria while clarifying accountability boundaries. The checklist designed in this study can serve as a simple and practical review tool for peer reference and use. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|
