|
| 同行评议操纵行为的识别与防范 |
| Identification and prevention of peer review manipulation//XIE Ruying, WANG Jingzhou |
| 投稿时间：2025-03-11 修订日期：2025-05-20 |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 同行评议操纵 虚假同行评议 科研失信行为 科研不端 学术期刊 治理 |
| 英文关键词: Peer review manipulation Fake peer review Scientific dishonesty Scientific misconduct Academic journal Governance |
| 基金项目:2024年广东省科技计划项目（2024B1212110006）；广东省哲学社会科学规划2024年度一般项目（GD24CZX02）；广东省科学技术期刊编辑学会2024年基金项目（2024-YB-29） |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 233 |
| 全文下载次数: 0 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 同行评议操纵是近年全球论文大规模撤稿的最主要原因之一，它严重损害科学声誉，污染科研生态。作者或第三方的同行评议操纵行为更具隐蔽性，防范和治理难度较大。本文分析作者或第三方的同行评议操纵行为的表现及成因，界定其学术不端属性，并从评审专家信息、评审行为模式、评审网络关系三个方面识别操纵行为，其治理需从制度完善、技术升级、流程优化、文化重塑等多维度协同推进，核心在于打破信息孤岛，实现跨地区、跨系统、跨部门联合行动，建立“共建共治共享”的长效治理机制。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Peer review manipulation has become one of the main reasons for large-scale retractions of papers worldwide. It not only seriously damages the reputation of science but also causes a significant waste of resources. The manifestations of peer review manipulation are diverse and highly covert, making it difficult to prevent and govern. This paper analyzes the manifestations and causes of author or third-party related peer review manipulation, and defines its nature as academic misconduct. The manipulation can be identified by information of reviewers, patterns of review behavior and peer review network relationships. Governance requires coordinated efforts in improving systems, upgrading technology, optimizing processes and reshaping culture. The core is breaking information silos for joint cross-regional, cross-system and cross-departmental actions. The goal is to establish a long-term governance mechanism with shared input, management and benefits. |
|
View Fulltext
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
