| 徐晶,钦嫣.临床实践中文指南共识重复发表的现状、问题及治理建议.编辑学报,2025,37(4):422-425 |
| 临床实践中文指南共识重复发表的现状、问题及治理建议 |
| Research on standardization and consistency of Chinese guideline and consensus in the context of duplicate publishing and suggestions for improvement |
| |
| DOI：10.16811/j.cnki.1001-4314.2025.04.013 |
| 中文关键词: 临床实践指南 共识 重复发表 同时/二次发表 版本一致性 著作权 |
| 英文关键词: clinical practice guidelines consensus duplicate publishing simultaneous/secondary publication consistency of version copyright |
| 基金项目:*江苏省科技期刊学会·TrendMD期刊学术传播基金资助项目(JSKJQK-TM-2025-007)；江苏省高校理科学报期刊出版研究课题(JSLK2024B10);江苏卫生健康职业学院重点项目(JKB202204) |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 0 |
| 全文下载次数: 0 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 近年来,中国临床实践指南和专家共识的发布数量迅速增加,但重复发表(多刊同时/二次发表)的现象也日益普遍。本文以2019—2023年中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)来源期刊中的466篇重复发表指南为样本,调查了其规范性、一致性及版权信息标注情况。研究表明,重复发表虽有助于指南的广泛传播,但也带来了文献冗余等问题。具体问题包括标题、作者署名、 |
| 英文摘要: |
| In recent years, China has witnessed a rapid proliferation of clinical practice guidelines and expert consensus documents, accompanied by a growing prevalence of duplicative publication practices(simultaneous or secondary dissemination across multiple journals). This study analyzed 466 cases of duplicated guidelines/consensus statements indexed in China Science Citation Database(CSCD) source journals between 2019-2023, with particular focus on their standardization, elemental consistency, and copyright information labeling. While duplicative publication facilitates broader dissemination of clinical recommendations, it simultaneously introduces challenges including literature redundancy. Key issues identified encompass inconsistencies in titles, authorship attribution, Keywords, abstracts, and other metadata elements, alongside non-standardized copyright annotations. To address these concerns, this paper proposes targeted strategies:establishing a unified national platform for guideline publication, forming cross-journal collaborative publishing alliances, and enhancing editorial self-regulation mechanisms. These measures aim to ensure accurate and consistent dissemination of clinical guidelines while preserving their scientific integrity and impact, particularly in contexts where duplicative publication is deemed necessary for knowledge diffusion. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|
