| 金铁成,姚玮华,周凤航,王皓,邓秀林,钟镇.《Nature》引用撤稿论文的现状与启示.编辑学报,2025,37(5):585-590 |
| 《Nature》引用撤稿论文的现状与启示 |
| Current status and implications of Nature citing retracted papers |
| |
| DOI：10.16811/j.cnki.1001-4314.2025.05.023 |
| 中文关键词: 撤稿论文 引用 著录规范 参考文献 《自然》 |
| 英文关键词: retracted papers citation recording standards references Nature |
| 基金项目: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 894 |
| 全文下载次数: 473 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 为促进学术期刊对撤稿论文的知情引用与规范著录,本文研究了《Nature》引用撤稿论文的情况并利用Web of Science数据库构建了一种从施引论文文后参考文献入手检测出被引撤稿论文的方法,收集了施引论文中撤稿论文的相关著录信息(正文与文后参考文献中的撤稿标识词),整理了撤稿论文(被引论文)的相关撤稿信息(撤稿日期、下载权限、网页版、PDF版、引文元数据的撤稿标识词)。研究结果表明:21篇《Nature》论文引用了2007—2025年出版的21篇撤稿论文,近5年来《Nature》引用撤稿论文有明显增多的趋势,且33.3%属于期刊自引；61.9%的《Nature》施引论文没有提及撤稿论文的撤稿状态,将撤稿论文作为普通论文加以引用；《Nature》对撤稿论文的著录格式尚未统一,目前尚未开放撤稿论文的下载权限；《Nature》对撤稿论文的规范标识处理尚有不足,即撤稿论文的网页版、PDF版、引文元数据缺少撤稿标识词。针对撤稿论文数量激增、引用不知情、著录不规范的现状,本文建议学术期刊将撤稿论文的审查纳入常规管理,充分利用Edifix、ReCheck、善锋软件批量处理文后参考文献,从而高效检测出撤稿论文,根据期刊自身实际情况选取合适的格式规范著录撤稿论文。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| To enhance the assurance of conscious citation and standardized documentation of retracted papers in academic journals, this study conducts an in-depth investigation into the citation practices of retracted papers within the globally esteemed journal Nature. Leveraging the Web of Science database, a methodical approach was devised to identify retracted papers cited in Nature articles by scrutinizing the reference lists of the citing works. The study systematically gathered data on retracted papers, encompassing retraction indicators within the main text and references of citing papers, and organized retraction-related details of the cited retracted papers, such as retraction dates, download permissions, and retraction markers in the web version, PDF version, and citation metadata of the retracted papers. The results reveal that 21 Nature articles have cited 21 retracted papers published from 2007 to 2024, with a noticeable increase in citations over the past five years. Approximately one-third of these cited retracted papers were self-citations by Nature. Alarmingly, 61.9% of the citing papers neglected to acknowledge the retraction status, treating retracted papers as if they were regular publications. Furthermore, Nature lacks a consistent recording format for retracted papers and has not granted download permissions for them. Additionally, retracted papers in Nature frequently lack appropriate retraction markers in their web and PDF versions, as well as in citation metadata. In light of the escalating number of retracted papers and challenges such as unaware citations and non-standardized recording, the study proposes that academic journals incorporate retracted paper reviews into their routine management. It also recommends utilizing tools like Edifix, ReCheck, and Shanfeng Software to efficiently process reference lists in batches, detect retracted papers, and select appropriate formats for standardized recording of retracted papers tailored to the journal’s specific needs. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|
|
|
