文章摘要
“编研互济”理念下科技期刊青年编辑职业成长路径研究
Research on the Professional Growth Path of Young Sci-Tech Journal Editors under the Concept of "Editing-Research Mutual Reinforcement"
投稿时间:2025-12-31  修订日期:2026-03-19
DOI:
中文关键词: 编研互济  科技期刊青年编辑  职业成长  学术参与
英文关键词: mutual support between editing and research  young editors of scientific journals  career growth  academic participation
基金项目:
作者单位邮编
苏盼盼* 华东师范大学 200033
王晓宇 上海市疾病预防控制中心 
摘要点击次数: 596
全文下载次数: 549
中文摘要:
      为回应科技期刊高质量发展对编辑队伍提出的更高要求,本文遵循理论框架构建—实践案例验证—学理反思升华的研究逻辑,系统梳理青年编辑职业发展的阶段性特征,并深入分析其在学术共同体中身份与角色的演变过程。研究首先界定了“编研互济”的理论内涵、成长路径和核心机制;其次,基于上海市科技期刊优秀青年编辑职业成长的典型案例,验证了该理念在新手适应期、快速成长期及成熟稳定期的实践路径;最后提出促进青年编辑职业成长的策略。研究发现:科技期刊青年编辑的职业成长是一个由学术资本转换、专业身份构建及共同体反馈机制共同驱动的动态过程。基于此,提出以编辑主业为根基、以学术参与为抓手、以多元评价为导向、以身份认同为核心、以资源整合为支撑的“编研互济”发展策略。
英文摘要:
      To respond to the higher demands posed by the high-quality development of scientific journals, this article adheres to the research logic of theoretical framework construction—practical case validation—academic reflection sublimation, systematically combs through the staged characteristics of young editors' career development, and deeply analyzes the evolution process of their identity and role within the academic community. The study first defines the theoretical connotation, growth path, and core mechanism of "Editing-Research Mutual Reinforcement"; Secondly, based on the exemplary case of career growth for outstanding young editors in Shanghai's science and technology journals, it verifies the practical paths of this concept during the novice adaptation period, rapid growth period, and mature stabilization period; finally, it proposes strategies to promote editorial career growth from the dimension of academic reflection sublimation. The study finds that the career growth of young editors in scientific journals is a dynamic process driven by academic capital conversion, professional identity construction, and community feedback mechanisms. Based on this, the article proposes a "mutual support between editing and research" development strategy with editorial professionalism as the foundation, academic participation as the handle, diversified evaluation as the orientation, identity recognition as the core, and resource integration as the support.
View Fulltext   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭