| 张洁,马欣荣,杨峰.学术期刊“影子审稿”中团队成员替审行为规范及改进措施.编辑学报,2026,38(1):58-63 |
| 学术期刊“影子审稿”中团队成员替审行为规范及改进措施 |
| Standardization and improvement measures for team members’review behavior in “shadow review” of academic journals |
| |
| DOI：10.16811/j.cnki.1001-4314.2026.01.010 |
| 中文关键词: 团队成员替审行为 团队成员共同审稿 学术期刊 “影子审稿” 学术不端 同行评审 |
| 英文关键词: team member substitute reviewing collaborative team review academic journals “shadow review” academic misconduct peer review |
| 基金项目:*中国农业期刊网研究基金项目(CAJW2025-064)；全国高等学校文科学报研究会基金项目(YB2025049) |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 600 |
| 全文下载次数: 391 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 同行评审在学术期刊论文发表过程中起着关键作用。同行评审中的团队成员替审作为“影子审稿”的一种,尽管被定义为学术不端行为,但因其行为的隐蔽性和普遍性禁而不止。同行评审中团队成员替审行为一直行走在审稿的灰色地带,一定程度上支撑着期刊的正常运行,这启发我们规范和改进这一审稿行为。本文通过对替审、团队审稿和协作审稿的多维度比较,同时借鉴国际同行实践,认为赋予团队替审者合法的身份,变团队成员替审为团队成员共同审稿可有效解决这一问题。在加强对共同审稿人培训和保密意识教育的基础上,通过监督问责机制杜绝评审过程的学术不端行为,通过评价激励机制让优秀的团队成员成为独立审稿人。借助良好的“编辑—作者”互动,为团队共同审稿人搭建成长的平台,使他们完成从“作者—审稿人”到“核心作者—优秀审稿人”的转变,实现其职业生涯成长和期刊高质量发展的双赢。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Peer review in academic journals plays a decisive role in the publication of scholarly papers. Team member substitution in peer review, as a form of “shadow review”, is defined as academic misconduct. However, due to its covert nature and widespread practice, it persists despite prohibitions and continues to operate in the gray area of the review process. To some extent, it even helps maintain the normal operation of journals, which inspires us to standardize and improve this reviewing practice. Through a multidimensional comparison of substitution, team review, and collaborative review, by drawing on international practices, we argue that granting legitimate status to substitute reviewers within teams and transforming team member substitution into collaborative team review can effectively address this issue. On the basis of strengthening training and confidentiality awareness for collaborative reviewers, academic misconduct in the review process can be eliminated through supervision and accountability mechanisms. Meanwhile, evaluation and incentive mechanisms can enable outstanding team members to become independent reviewers. Through effective editor-author interactions, a platform for growth can be established for collaborative team reviewers, facilitating their transition from author-reviewers to core authors-excellent reviewers. This achieves a win-win outcome:fostering their career development and promoting the high-quality growth of academic journals. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|
|
|
