| 詹静.论文撤稿调查中的美国科研失信行为调查规则的演进研究.编辑学报,2026,38(2):172-178 |
| 论文撤稿调查中的美国科研失信行为调查规则的演进研究 |
| Research on the evolution of investigation rules for research misconduct in the context of paper retraction inquiries in the United States |
| |
| DOI：10.16811/j.cnki.1001-4314.2026.02.008 |
| 中文关键词: 论文撤稿 科研失信 程序正义 美国科研诚信办公室 |
| 英文关键词: paper retraction research misconduct procedural justice Office of Research Integrity |
| 基金项目: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 633 |
| 全文下载次数: 66 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 当前,论文撤稿数量呈现上升态势,然而多数科技期刊缺乏公开、明确且统一的问题论文调查处理规则,致使程序公正性遭受质疑。本研究针对美国科研诚信办公室所制定的科研失信行为规则的3个版本开展对比分析,发现该规则的演进历程清晰地展现出对Leventhal’s Rules中公平性6项原则的持续强化。与此同时,我国现阶段的《科研失信行为调查处理规则》同样具备这6项程序正义原则。本研究表明,期刊应主动制定兼顾程序正义的问题论文调查处理规则,以保障处理过程的公正性,从而有效维护科研诚信环境。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| The number of retracted papers is increasing, yet most sci-tech journals lack transparent, clear, and standardized procedures for investigating and handling problematic papers, raising concerns about procedural justice. This study compares three versions of research misconduct rules developed by the U.S. Office of Research Integrity and finds that the evolution of these rules clearly reflects a continuous strengthening of the six principles of fairness outlined in Leventhal’s Rules. Concurrently, these six principles of procedural justice are also present in China’s current. Regulations on the Investigation and Handling of Research Misconduct. We suggest that journals establish investigation and handling regulations for problematic papers that incorporate procedural justice, ensuring fairness in the process and thereby effectively safeguarding research integrity. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|
|
|
