|
| 层级认知错位视域下科技期刊集群化困境及治理<sub><sup>*</sup></sub> |
| Dilemmas and governance of scientific journal clustering from the perspective of hierarchical cognitive misalignment//TIAN Haijiang, LUAN Jia, LI Yue, DENG Qiangting,PENG Xi |
| 投稿时间：2026-03-05 修订日期：2026-08-26 |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 科技期刊 集群化 层级差异 认知错位 组织行为 实证研究 |
| 英文关键词: scientific journals clustering hierarchical differences cognitive misalignment organizational behavior empirical study |
| 基金项目: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 7 |
| 全文下载次数: 0 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 科技期刊集群化作为提升学术资源配置效率和增强期刊竞争力的重要路径,在实践中却长期面临“集而不团”的困境。基于重庆区域科技期刊问卷调查数据,从组织内部不同层级的认知差异入手,分析领导层、管理层与基层编辑在战略必要性判断、发展路径选择、利益预期及现实评价等方面的分化状况。研究发现,各层级虽在集群化总体方向上形成基本共识,但在市场化推进方式、利润分配机制及业务重构重点等关键议题上存在明显差异,领导层更强调战略转型与资源整合,基层编辑则更关注具体业务运行与工作负担问题,层级间在目标理解与行动期待上的错位,削弱了战略执行的一致性。认知分化与利益诉求差异叠加,容易导致战略传导受阻与行动脱节,是集群化停留于形式整合阶段的重要组织原因。应通过完善分层沟通机制、优化利益协调结构与强化基层参与渠道,促进战略认知趋同与治理协同,推动科技期刊集群化由行政推动向机制融合转变。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Scientific journal clustering has been regarded as an important approach to improving the efficiency of academic resource allocation and enhancing journal competitiveness. However, in practice, it has long been confronted with the dilemma of structural integration without substantive coordination. Based on questionnaire data collected from scientific journals in Chongqing, this study examines cognitive differences among organizational levels and analyzes divergences between leadership, middle management, and frontline editors in terms of strategic necessity, development pathways, benefit expectations, and evaluations of current conditions. The findings indicate that although a general consensus exists regarding the overall direction of clustering, significant differences emerge on key issues such as market-oriented implementation, profit distribution mechanisms, and priorities in business restructuring. Leadership tends to emphasize strategic transformation and resource integration, whereas frontline editors focus more on operational processes and workload concerns. The misalignment in goal interpretation and action expectations across hierarchical levels weakens the coherence of strategy implementation. The interaction between cognitive divergence and differentiated interest claims constitutes an important organizational factor underlying the persistence of formal rather than substantive integration. It is therefore necessary to strengthen cross-level communication mechanisms, optimize benefit coordination structures, and enhance grassroots participation in order to promote strategic alignment and governance synergy, thereby facilitating the transition of scientific journal clustering from administrative mobilization to mechanism-based integration. |
|
View Fulltext
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|
|
|
