| 李玉乐,刘辉,李慧文,李娜,刘洋,杨爽,陈耀龙.我国中文医学科技期刊指南与共识报告质量评价及规范化建设研究.编辑学报,2026,38(4):475-482 |
| 我国中文医学科技期刊指南与共识报告质量评价及规范化建设研究 |
| Reporting quality and standardization of clinical practice guidelines and expert consensus statements in Chinese medical journals： an evaluation and call for improvement |
| |
| DOI：10.16811/j.cnki.1001-4314.2026.04.011 |
| 中文关键词: 临床实践指南 专家共识 质量评价 报告规范 调研 医学科技期刊 |
| 英文关键词: clinical practice guidelines expert consensus statements quality evaluation reporting specification investigation and survey medical sci-tech journals |
| 基金项目:中国科学技术期刊编辑学会2023年度“翰笔计划医学中青年编辑”科研项目（HBJH-2023-A03） |
| 作者 | 单位 | 邮编 | | 李玉乐 | 1）中国医学科学院北京协和医学院,北京协和医院《协和医学杂志》编辑部,100730,北京 | 100730 | | 刘辉 | 2）中国医学科学院循证评价与指南研究创新单元,兰州大学基础医学院,730000,兰州 | 730000 | | 李慧文 | 1）中国医学科学院北京协和医学院,北京协和医院《协和医学杂志》编辑部,100730,北京 | 100730 | | 李娜 | 1）中国医学科学院北京协和医学院,北京协和医院《协和医学杂志》编辑部,100730,北京 | 100730 | | 刘洋 | 1）中国医学科学院北京协和医学院,北京协和医院《协和医学杂志》编辑部,100730,北京 | 100730 | | 杨爽 | 3）中国医学科学院北京协和医学院,医学信息研究所,100730,北京 | 100730 | | 陈耀龙* | 2）中国医学科学院循证评价与指南研究创新单元,兰州大学基础医学院,730000,兰州
4）世界卫生组织指南实施与知识转化合作中心,730000,兰州
5）甘肃省循证医学重点实验室,730000,兰州 | 730000 |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 156 |
| 全文下载次数: 22 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 本研究综合采用文献分析、质量评估、问卷调查及网站调研等方法，对我国中文医学科技期刊指南与共识的报告质量及规范化建设现状展开系统评估，深入剖析其中存在的主要问题与薄弱环节，并探寻改进建议与优化策略，旨在进一步提升我国指南与共识的报告质量，推动医学科技期刊高质量发展。研究表明，我国中文医学科技期刊指南与共识的报告质量总体偏低，尤其在评审与质量保障流程、利益冲突声明管理、证据来源与评价报告等关键环节存在显著不足。调查结果显示，65.08%的中文医学科技期刊缺乏指南与共识报告规范相关制度，79.37%的中文医学科技期刊编辑未接受过相关报告规范培训，96.46%的期刊未在其官网稿约及投稿须知中对指南与共识的撰写作出明确规定。基于上述研究结果，本研究建议期刊出版单位应加速完善相关制度建设，将国际通用的报告规范明确纳入期刊投稿指南；期刊编辑应主动加强相关方法论学习，并积极参与指南与共识的制定实践；同时，应开展面向编辑、作者及审稿人的系统化培训，构建多方协同的质量提升机制，共同推动我国指南与共识在规范性、科学性与透明度方面的整体提升。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| This study employed a comprehensive approach， including literature analysis， quality assessment， questionnaire surveys， and website investigations， to systematically evaluate the reporting quality and normative development of guidelines and consensus statements published in Chinese medical sci-tech journals. It further examined the main existing problems and weaknesses， and explored recommendations and optimization strategies to improve the reporting quality of guidelines and consensus statements and promote the high-quality development of medical sci-tech journals in China. The findings indicate that the overall reporting quality of guidelines and consensus statements in Chinese medical sci-tech journals remains relatively low， with notable deficiencies in key areas such as review and quality assurance processes， management of conflicts of interest， and reporting of evidence sources and evaluations. The survey revealed that 65.08% of Chinese medical sci-tech journals lack institutional policies regarding reporting standards for guidelines and consensus statements， 79.37% of editors have not received training related to such reporting standards， and 96.46% of journals do not provide explicit requirements for the preparation of guidelines and consensus statements in their official author guidelines or submission instructions. Based on these findings， it is recommended that journal publishers accelerate the improvement of relevant institutional frameworks by explicitly incorporating internationally recognized reporting standards into journal submission guidelines. Editors should proactively enhance their methodological knowledge and actively participate in the development of guidelines and consensus statements. Furthermore， systematic training should be provided for editors， authors， and reviewers to establish a multi-stakeholder collaborative mechanism for quality improvement， thereby collectively advancing the standardization， scientific rigor， and transparency of guidelines and consensus statements in China. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|
|
|
