|
| “中国科技期刊卓越行动计划”二期中文医药领军期刊的特征分析 |
| Analysis of characteristics of leading Chinese medical journals under the second phase of the China Scientific Journal Excellence Action Plan |
| 投稿时间：2026-06-18 修订日期：2026-08-10 |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 卓越行动计划 中文科技期刊 医药期刊 学术影响力 办刊经验 案例分析 |
| 英文关键词: Excellence Action Plan Chinese-language scientific journals medical journals academic influence publishing experience case analysis |
| 基金项目:安徽省科技期刊编辑学会出版基金项目（AESSP2024C02）；新时代育人省级质量工程项目(研究生教育)(2024jyjxggyjY169) |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 34 |
| 全文下载次数: 0 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 为评估“中国科技期刊卓越行动计划”二期中文医药领军期刊的发展特征与办刊经验，本研究以二期入选的26种医药相关中文领军期刊为分析对象，回溯其2020-2024年间的载文规模、学术影响力指标及出版特征，并对一二期资助格局的流动情况进行描述性分析。研究发现：26种期刊在载文量变化上呈现多元化格局，逾半数期刊载文量有所收缩，同时多数期刊的影响因子与总被引频次实现显著提升；高被引论文的主要类型为指南/共识/规范类文献（占比约40%～50%）与学科综述类文献（占比约23%～30%），两者合计超过70%，这一结构特征提示，临床规范性文本与集成型综述在当前中文医药期刊的被引构成中占有较大比重；一二期资助名单的更替与延续，反映出项目在支持已有优势期刊的同时，也为成长性期刊打开了进入通道。在此基础上，本文以二期领军入选期刊《临床肝胆病杂志》为例，从出版服务与知识服务两个维度剖析其办刊举措。最后，结合上述分析，就领军期刊的办刊实践提出几点启示与建议，以期为中文医药期刊的同行提供参考。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| To evaluate the development characteristics and publishing experience of leading Chinese-language medical journals under the second phase of the China Scientific Journal Excellence Action Plan, this study takes 26 selected leading Chinese-language medical journals as the core sample, traces their publication scale, academic impact indicators, and publishing features from 2020 to 2024, and conducts a descriptive analysis of the funding transition between Phase I and Phase II. The findings reveal a diversified pattern in publication volume changes among the 26 journals, with over half showing a decline while most journals achieved significant increases in impact factor and total citation frequency. The main types of highly cited papers are guidelines/consensus/standards (approximately 40%–50%) and subject reviews (approximately 23%–30%), together exceeding 70%. This structural feature suggests that clinical normative documents and integrative reviews account for a considerable proportion of the citation composition of current Chinese medical journals.The transition between Phase I and Phase II funding reflects a dynamic balance between supporting established advantages and opening channels for emerging journals. Based on these findings, this study takes Journal of Clinical Hepatology, a leading journal selected in Phase II, as a case example and analyzes its practices from the dimensions of publishing service and knowledge service. Finally, several implications and suggestions are proposed to provide references for peer Chinese medical journals. |
|
View Fulltext
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
