|
| 把AI变成“第二双眼睛”：科技期刊审稿中的增效技巧 |
| AI as a "Second Pair of Eyes": Enhancing Efficiency in Journal Peer Review |
| 投稿时间：2026-07-03 修订日期：2026-07-15 |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: AI辅助审稿 人机协作 审稿效率 |
| 英文关键词: AI-assisted peer review Human-AI collaboration Review efficiency |
| 基金项目: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 151 |
| 全文下载次数: 0 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 审稿属于科技期刊质量把控的关键部分，也是编辑工作当中最繁杂的事务。编辑经常要在一个短时间里对图文繁杂的长篇文章进行审阅，找出其中的问题并给出公正的评审意见，这是期刊编辑普遍遇到的工作难题。本文根据实操经验，把AI工具融入审稿流程中，把人工智能当作编辑的“第二双眼睛”，只辅助完成信息检索、文字校核、逻辑校对这些基础的工作，不取代编辑专业的学术判断，有效地提高了审稿效率和审核的准确性。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Peer review stands as a critical gatekeeping mechanism in scientific journal publishing and constitutes one of the most labor-intensive responsibilities in editorial practice. Editors are frequently required to evaluate lengthy manuscripts replete with complex data and graphics under tight deadlines, identifying substantive issues and rendering objective assessments—a task that presents persistent challenges to the profession. Drawing on empirical editorial experience, this study integrates artificial intelligence into the manuscript evaluation workflow, positioning AI as a "second pair of eyes" for editors. The technology is strictly confined to supporting foundational tasks such as information retrieval, textual proofreading, and logical consistency checks, while deliberately excluding it from replacing professional scholarly judgment. This approach effectively enhances both the efficiency of the review process and the accuracy of editorial decisions. |
|
View Fulltext
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
