| 徐书令,房威.学术论文同行评审: 过去·现状·未来.编辑学报,2016,28(6):535-538 |
| 学术论文同行评审: 过去·现状·未来 |
| Peer review for scholarly papers:past, present, and future |
| 投稿时间：2014-11-18 修订日期：2014-11-18 |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 同行评审 单向匿名评审 双向匿名评审 开放式评审 交互式评论 |
| 英文关键词: peer review single-blind review double-blind review open peer review interactive peer review |
| 基金项目: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 1889 |
| 全文下载次数: 1158 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 研究同行评审制度有助于审视学术交流与出版过程,以检验对学术成果的审查和管理工作的合理性,包括评审结果的正确性和评审方法的公平性,并进而为同行评审制度的发展和完善提供参考依据。文章简要介绍同行评审的发展历程,阐述并探讨学术论文同行评审的作用以及存在和面临的问题,并分析同行评审的发展趋势。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Research of peer review process and its outcomes can benefit survey over academic communication and publication, in order to examine the qualification of the survey and management of academic outcomes, including correctness of survey results and impartiality of methodology, and thus provide references and suggestions for improvement of the peer review system. This paper briefly introduces the history of peer review of scholarly papers, and presents a speculative description of the crucial importance and inevitable thorns of this nearly universally accepted social rule, followed by a coarse analysis of the system's future prospects. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|
