| 丁佐奇.提高同行专家审稿积极性的实践及思考.编辑学报,2017,29(1):58-59 |
| 提高同行专家审稿积极性的实践及思考 |
| Practice and thought on improving the enthusiasm of peer reviewer |
| 投稿时间：2016-08-09 修订日期：2016-08-09 |
| DOI：10.16811/j.cnki.1001-4314.2017.01.019 |
| 中文关键词: 同行评审 实践研究 对策 |
| 英文关键词: peer review practical experience strategy |
| 基金项目:中国高校科技期刊研究会“科技期刊学”专项课题 |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 1373 |
| 全文下载次数: 1202 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 同行审稿是保障期刊学术质量的重要环节,但同行专家审稿积极性不高、拒绝审稿、勉强审稿已成为普遍现象。如何提高审稿专家的积极性,是学术期刊亟待解决的共性问题。文章以《中国天然药物》编辑部近年来约请审稿人的实践心得为基础,讨论提高专家审稿积极性的措施:选择潜在作者群作为审稿专家,避免过量送审,加大初审退稿率,尊重审稿专家的要求,与无反馈的审稿专家取得联系,利用ORCID认可审稿专家的贡献等,旨在致力于提高专家的审稿同意率,从而在源头上推动期刊的发展。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Peer review is a key process to ensure the quality of academic journals. However, it is well recognized that many “peers” are reluctant to participate in the peer review process and are thus ready to reject the invitation of peer review from editor. This article intends to discuss how to improve the enthusiasm of peer reviewers, based on the practice of Chinese Journal of Natural Medicines, and suggests a series of strategies:selecting potential authors as reviewers, avoiding excessive invitation, increasing the ratio of rejection in the primary review by editor, respecting the requests of reviewers, making a contact with the reviewers without feedback, and recognizing the contribution of reviewers by use of ORCID. The strategies might be expected to improve the enthusiasm of peer reviewers, and to promote the development of academic journals from the base. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|
