文章摘要
丁寒.掠夺性期刊的特征、危害及防治措施概述.编辑学报,2022,(1):38-42
掠夺性期刊的特征、危害及防治措施概述
Analysis on characteristics, harm and prevention measures of predatory periodicals
  
DOI:10.16811/j.cnki.1001-4314.2022.01.008
中文关键词: 掠夺性期刊  开放获取  同行评议
英文关键词: predatory journals  open access  peer review
基金项目:
作者单位
丁寒 安徽理工大学学术出版中心,232001,安徽淮南 
摘要点击次数: 335
全文下载次数: 178
中文摘要:
      为了全面探讨和正确认识掠夺性期刊,本文利用文献研究和概括总结的方法,分析掠夺性期刊的由来、特征以及危害。结果发现,掠夺性期刊存在以下特征:主动邀稿、审稿不严、出版周期短、收费高;编造虚假的编委会名单;仿冒网站或网站不专业;编造或伪造期刊指标;收购“老牌期刊”或发文不符;掠夺对象有地域性。掠夺性期刊发表低质量论文,传播错误的理论知识,误导研究人员,污染主流期刊;同时污染学术简历,影响科学家声誉,浪费科研资源,扰乱OA运动发展。掠夺性期刊严重影响了科研环境的健康发展,相关部门应通过采取优化科研激励机制和学术评价方法、加大监管力度和开放同行评议以及规范发表费的收取3方面措施进行干预。
英文摘要:
      To comprehensively explore and correctly understand predatory journals, we analyze the origin, characteristics and harm of predatory journals by literature research survey. Our results show that predatory journals have the following characteristics:actively inviting contributions, lax review, rapid publication and high fees; fabricating a false list of editorial boards; not professional journal website; fake periodical indexes; buying “established journals”; published content inconsistent with the journal positioning. Predatory journals publish low-quality papers, spread false theoretical knowledge, mislead researchers, and pollute mainstream journals. Moreover, predatory journals pollute the academic reputation of researchers; waste scientific research resources and disrupt the development of OA movement. The predatory journals have seriously affected the healthy development of the scientific research environment. We think predatory journals can be intervened by optimizing scientific research incentive mechanism and academic evaluation method, strengthening the supervision and opening the peer review, and standardizing the publication fee of OA journals.
查看全文   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭