文章摘要
群审稿——一种专家主动审稿模式的探索
Exploration of Group Review: a Mode of Expert Proactive Review//Guo Wei, Chen Yong
投稿时间:2018-03-19  修订日期:2018-05-19
DOI:
中文关键词: 审稿模式  同行评议  审稿效率  群审稿  微信群  QQ群
英文关键词: review mode  peer review  the efficiency of review  group review  WeChat group  QQ group
基金项目:中国科协精品科技期刊工程项目(2105KJQK003-1:JPQK4-X-071)
作者单位E-mail
郭伟 湖北工业大学 中国机械工程杂志社,430068 武汉 apple@cmemo.org.cn 
陈勇 湖北工业大学 中国机械工程杂志社,430068 武汉 cy@cmemo.org.cn 
摘要点击次数: 61
全文下载次数: 
中文摘要:
      针对当前同行评议效率低的情况,将微信群或QQ群引入审稿中,提出一种专家主动审稿的模式——群审稿,并阐述了该模式的审稿过程。结合工作实践,指出了构建审稿群要考虑的要素:期刊建群数量、每个编辑能管好群的数量、审稿群的人数,以及群审稿专家遴选原则。详细介绍了编辑和审稿专家在群审稿过程中的主要工作。分析了群审稿模式的优势:能做到精准送审、及时审回;审稿信息的传达安全、快捷;对于防止学术不端行为有一定的效果;专家之间、专家与编辑之间能即时互动;容易附加增值服务。最后指出了群审稿模式的不足。
英文摘要:
      Based on the low efficiency of the current peer review, WeChat group or QQ group is used in review work, a mode of the expert actively reviewing (group review) is put forward, and the process of group review is described. Based on the work practice, this paper points out the factors of constructing review group: the review groups’ number of a journal, the number of groups that each editor can manage, the persons ’number of a review group, and the selection principle of group review experts. And it introduces the work details of editors and review experts in review process. This paper analyzes the advantages of group review mode: it can be accurate to submit for review and review timely, the transmission of the review information is safe and fast, it can Prevention of academic unethical behaviors, it has some real-time interaction among Members of the group, it is easy to add value-added services. Finally, the paper points out the shortcomings of the group review mode. Finally, the paper points out the disadvantages of group review mode.
View Fulltext   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭