文章摘要
基于稿件引文内容分析的同行评审专家遴选方法*
Selection method of peer review expert based on manuscript citation contents analysis// WANG Jingzhou,CUIJianying
投稿时间:2020-05-21  修订日期:2020-07-13
DOI:
中文关键词: 同行评审  专家遴选  引用内容  情感分析  引文评价
英文关键词: peer review  expert selection  citation context  sentiment analysis  citation evaluation
基金项目:2018年度广东省哲学社会科学规划共建项目(GD18XXW05);广州市哲学社会科学发展“十三五”规划2019年度课题(2019GZYB19);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目(21620811)
作者单位E-mail
王景周 暨南大学学报编辑部 jzwang@jnu.edu.cn 
崔建英 中山大学《逻辑学研究》编辑部 cuijiany@mail.sysu.edu.cn 
摘要点击次数: 130
全文下载次数: 0
中文摘要:
      同行评审意见是期刊编辑用稿决策的重要依据,同行评审专家的来源和遴选与评审结果的质量和公平性密切相关。编辑为一篇稿件遴选出评审意愿、专业、能力匹配,且时间充裕的审稿专家是比较费时、费力的。本文基于投稿论文的参考文献和引用的内容、动机及情感分析,提出一种同行评审专家的遴选方法。该方法有助于“小同行”专家的发现,降低不同学术范式导致的同行评议误判率,为编辑稿件送审提供参考。
英文摘要:
      Peer review opinionsare significant basis for journal editors toaccept or reject a manuscript, the source and selection of peer review experts are closely related to the quality and fairness of the review results. It is a rather time-consuming and laborious task for the editor to select a manuscript reviewer who has the willingness, professionalism, and ability to go through a manuscript with enough time. This article proposes a method for selecting peer review experts based on the references, motivation, and sentiment analysis of the submitted papers. This method helps the discovery ofcounterpart experts and reduces the misjudgment rate of peer review caused by different academiccriteria and provides a reference for the submission of edited manuscripts.
View Fulltext   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭