|
| 科技期刊编辑部在科研失信行为查处中的主体责任* |
| Responsibilities of Editorial Office of the Sci-tech Journal in Investigation and Disposition of Research Dis-integrities// YIN Bo |
| 投稿时间：2020-07-01 修订日期：2020-07-07 |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 科技期刊编辑部 科研诚信 科研失信 学术不端 主体责任 |
| 英文关键词: editorial office of the sci-tech journal research integrity research dis-integrity academic misconduct responsibility of the subject |
| 基金项目: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 377 |
| 全文下载次数: 0 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 科技期刊编辑部应对学术不端的方式的研究大多落脚到实然层面的预防策略建议，对于应然层面如何调查处理的法律规范分析长期缺失。本文展现《科研诚信案件调查处理规则（试行）》出台的背景，进而对相关规定进行法教义学分析。对科技期刊编辑部在科研失信行为查处中的主体责任，《规则（试行）》将受规制行为由学术不端拓展为科研失信，规定了配合开展调查责任，以及独立的举报受理、调查处理责任。对于《规则（试行）》的未尽之处，科技期刊编辑部可在投稿发稿过程中，运用各种契约中的科研诚信条款对处理措施予以约定。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| The research concerning how editorial office of the sci-tech journal deal with academic misconducts has been generally ending up with providing preventive techniques at practical level. The legal analysis of how to investigate and dispose of the cases concerning academic misconducts at normative level has been absent for a long period. This article introduces the background of the Proposed Rules of Investigation and Disposition of Research Integrity Cases, and then makes a doctrinal analysis of the related norms. In terms of the responsibilities of editorial office of the sci-tech journals in investigating and disposing of research dis-integrities, this Proposed Rules expands regulated conducts from academic misconducts to research dis-integrities, and stipulates the collaborative responsibility of investigation as well as the independent responsibility of report acceptance, investigation, and disposition for the editorial office. For the loopholes of the Proposed Rules, editorial office of the sci-tech journal can use terms and conditions of research integrity in various contracts to make an agreement concerning the dispositive measures during the process of submission and publication. |
|
View Fulltext
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
