文章摘要
科技期刊稿件技术检查的“3S”法
3S method for technical check of manuscripts submitted to scientific journals
投稿时间:2020-07-24  修订日期:2020-09-21
DOI:
中文关键词: 科技期刊稿件  技术检查  投稿时间延迟  论文快速发表
英文关键词: manuscripts submitted to scientific journals  technical check  submission delay time  rapid publication
基金项目:《中国科技期刊卓越行动计划》重点期刊项目(2019-B10)
作者单位E-mail
张姣 清华大学 jiaozhang@tsinghua.edu.cn 
朱建军 高等教育出版社有限公司  
摘要点击次数: 34
全文下载次数: 0
中文摘要:
      科技期刊对稿件的技术检查会导致稿件延迟提交,不利于科研成果的快速发表。本刊实施了“详细检查”(1S法)、“列表明示要求+详细检查”(2S法)和“列表明示要求+初稿简查+修改稿详查”(3S法)3种不同的技术检查方法,发现2S法和3S法在减少被退回稿件比例、减少被退回次数、缩短投稿延迟时间方面均有成效,且3S法可作为优化技术检查的方法供同行参考。
英文摘要:
      The technical check of manuscripts submitted to scientific journals could delay their submission time, which was against to the rapid publication expectation. Three measures, “specific check” (1S method), “stressing requirements by a list+specific check” (2S method), and “stressing requirements by a list+simple check for original submission+specific check for revision” (3S method), were conducted and analyzed successively by our journal, and the 2S method and 3S method were observed to be effective in reducing the proportion of returned manuscripts, reducing the return times, and shortening the submission delay time. The 3S method is worth sharing with colleagues as a modification of technical check.
View Fulltext   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭