|
| 提高同行评议质量和效率的几种方法 |
| Several methods to improve the quality and efficiency of peer-review//HUANG Chongya, KANG Liemei |
| 投稿时间：2020-08-22 修订日期：2020-09-30 |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 学术期刊 同行评议 学术质量 审稿质量 审稿效率 |
| 英文关键词: academic journals peer review academic quality review quality review efficiency |
| 基金项目:* 中国高校科技期刊研究会专项课题资助项目( CUJS2017-002) ; 陕西 省出版科学基金项目( 17BSC01) |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 36 |
| 全文下载次数: 0 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 同行评议制度是稿件学术质量控制的关键环节之一。本文以《西安交通大学学报》为例,以近5年经同行评议的稿件中评审质量不高和审稿延期的稿件为研究对象,首先从作者、同行评议专家、学科编辑3个方面分析影响审稿质量和效率的原因,然后针对这些原因,创新性地提出了从投稿前、投稿时、初审时、外审时4个环节,采用20种方法提高同行评议审稿质量和效率。这些方法不仅可操作性强,有助于提高编辑的工作效率,而且有利于准确把关稿件的学术质量。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| The peer-review system is one of the key steps to control the academic quality of manuscripts. This article taking Journal of Xi’an Jiaotong University as example, with the manuscripts of low reviewed quality and delayed reviewed from the journal in the past 5 years as an example. Firstly, the reasons affect the quality and efficiency of peer-review were briefly analyzed from the aspects of author, reviewer and editor respectively. Then, according to these reasons, it innovatively proposes 20 methods to improve the peers in four aspects: before submission, submission, initial review, and external review for reviewing quality and efficiency. These methods not only manageable and can improve the working efficiency of editors, but also good for control the academic quality of manuscripts. |
|
View Fulltext
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|
