|
| 中国大陆SCI期刊撤稿声明调查及建议 |
| Investigation and suggestion on retraction in Chinese mainland SCI journals |
| 投稿时间：2020-11-10 修订日期：2020-12-31 |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: SCI期刊 撤稿声明 调查报告 |
| 英文关键词: retraction SCI journal investigation report |
| 基金项目:中国科技期刊卓越行动计划（卓越计划C-137） |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 289 |
| 全文下载次数: 0 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 近年来,随着学术不端行为导致的撤稿事件频发,撤稿声明在中国大陆SCI期刊上发表的数量也日渐增长。越来越多的期刊需要处理疑似学术不端行为稿件的撤稿事宜,编辑部面临着前所未有的挑战。本研究通过对2016~2020年间Web of Science数据库核心合集收录的中国大陆SCI期刊上刊发的撤稿声明进行调查,记录并分析了相关撤稿声明的信息,包括发表期刊、期刊所属学科、发表时间及卷期号、题目、类型、被撤稿论文发表时间及其撤销后的引用情况等。调查结果显示,我国SCI期刊的撤稿发文规范整体良好,但还有许多不足,需要进一步提高撤稿意识、完善撤稿机制、规范撤稿要求,接轨国际标准,从而保证刊发论文的科学性和准确性,维护期刊的学术声誉,并为进一步建设世界一流科技期刊提供保障。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| In recent years, with the frequent retractions caused by academic misconduct, the number of retractions published in SCI journals in mainland China has also increased. More and more journals need to deal with the retraction of manuscripts suspected of academic misconduct, which is an unprecedented challenge. This study investigated the retraction notes published in Chinese mainland SCI journals by searching the Web of Science core database from 2016 to 2020, recorded and analyzed documental information, including journal title, disciplines of the journal, published time of the retraction note and retracted paper, the cited count of the retracted paper after retraction, etc. The results showed that the situation of retraction in Chinese mainland SCI journals is generally good, but there are still many deficiencies. We need to further raise the retraction consciousness, improve the retraction mechanism, standardize the retraction requirements, and comply with international standards, so as to ensure the scientificity and accuracy of published papers, maintain the journal’s academic reputation, and provide guarantee for further construction of world-class scientific and technological journals. |
|
View Fulltext
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|
