| Peer review is a critical part to ensure the academic quality of journals. Due to the wide range of disciplines, the large amount of contributions, the characteristics of "our school", the poor enthusiasm of some reviewers, and the need for "small peer" reviewers, journal of medical university need to continuously expand effective reviewers with high academic level, willing to review manuscripts, high efficiency and quality of reviewing manuscripts, related research direction, no conflict of interest with pending manuscripts, and authentic and reliable identity to improve the efficiency and quality of peer review. Based on the work practice, the author proposes to select reviewers by searching authoritative literature database, verify reviewers' identities, register detailed information, and evaluate reviewers' quality to amplify effective reviewers. Through practice, the periodicity of manuscript review and publication has been shortened, and the source of manuscripts has been expanded. |
