文章摘要
开放科学和科研评价改革背景下我国学术期刊同行评议的改革趋向
Reform Trend of Peer Review of Chinese Academic Journals in the Background of Open Science and Scientific Research Evaluation Reform
投稿时间:2021-07-27  修订日期:2021-09-10
DOI:
中文关键词: 同行评议  学术期刊  开放科学  科研评价改革
英文关键词: peer review  academic journals  open science  scientific research evaluation reform
基金项目:中国高校科技期刊研究会青年基金;中国科技期刊卓越行动计划
作者单位邮编
亢列梅 《西安交通大学学报》编辑部 710049
杜秀杰 《西安交通大学学报》编辑部 
荆树蓉 《西安交通大学学报》编辑部 
刘杨 《西安交通大学学报》编辑部 
摘要点击次数: 11
全文下载次数: 0
中文摘要:
      从国际开放科学运动、国内科研评价改革的现实背景出发,针对我国现行同行评议面临的挑战,指出改革我国学术期刊同行评议的必要性。立足同行评议的目的,提出我国学术期刊同行评议改革应向减轻评议人负担、充分利用新技术、创新评议方式、建立事后评议机制4个方向发展,并提出净化学术生态、加强制度设计、设定行为监督、建立激励和反馈机制4条保障举措,最后对同行评议改革的模式和可能存在的问题进行了展望。
英文摘要:
      In the background of international open science movement and domestic scientific research evaluation reforms, the necessity of reforming the peer review of academic journals in China is pointed out in response to the challenges faced by current peer review. Based on the purpose of peer review, it is proposed that the peer review of academic journals should be reformed from reducing the burden on reviewers, making full use of new technologies, innovating the way of review, and establishing an after-the-fact review mechanism. Meanwhile, purifying academic ecology, strengthening the system design, setting behavior supervision, establishing incentive and feedback mechanism should be guaranteed. Finally, the peer review model and possible problems in the reform process are prospected.
View Fulltext   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭