|
| 基于AMLC的科技期刊论文学术不端特征分析及对策研究 |
| Analysis and measure research on the characteristics of academic misconduct of papers in sci-tech journals based on AMLC |
| 投稿时间：2021-10-11 修订日期：2021-11-30 |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 学术不端 出版伦理 科研诚信 高校科技期刊 |
| 英文关键词: academic misconduct publishing ethics research integrity university scientific journal |
| 基金项目: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 205 |
| 全文下载次数: 0 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 本文以2011?2021年《电子科技大学学报》投稿论文基于AMLC的检测结果为研究对象，对文字复制比、作者信息、文章信息等进行特征分析和讨论。统计结果显示，疑似学术不端的论文占十年总投稿论文的11.7%，且十年来呈现整体递减趋势；在读研究生和副高职称研究人员是学术不端的高发人群；学术不端行为以剽窃文字表述为主，第一作者本人或者团队的前期研究成果是其主要来源，通常不加引注。由此得出：1) 文字复制不再是科技论文学术不端的显著特征，学术不端的表现形式越来越隐蔽且多样化，对此学术不端检测系统的作用有限；2) 缺乏针对合理引用的判断标准；3) 高校科研诚信和学术出版伦理建设亟待加强。因此，编辑部可分类型依托期刊协会统一制定明晰透明的学术不端判定标准、处置流程和内控制度，以学术不端检测系统为基础，加强发文要求和编辑规范，充分发挥专家和学术共同体的作用，协同应对学术不端，共建科研诚信体系。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Taking the duplicate checking data based on AMLC of the papers in the Journal of University of Electronic Science and Technology from 2011 to 2021 as the research object, this paper analyzes and discusses the characteristics of text copy ratio, author information, article information and so on. The statistical results show that the proportion of papers suspected of academic misconduct is 11.7%, and shows an overall decreasing trend over the past decade; graduate students and researchers with deputy senior titles are high incidence of academic misconduct; academic misconduct is mainly plagiarism. The previous research results of the first author or the team are the main source, usually without citation. As a result, it is concluded that: 1) text reproduction is no longer a significant feature of academic misconduct in scientific and technological papers, and the forms of academic misconduct are becoming more and more hidden and diversified. the role of this academic misconduct detection system is limited; 2) lack of judgment criteria for reasonable citation; 3) the construction of scientific research integrity and academic publishing ethics in colleges and universities need to be strengthened. Therefore, the editorial department can be divided into different types, relying on periodical associations to formulate clear and transparent standards for judging academic misconduct, disposal process and internal control system, and strengthen the publishing requirements and editorial norms on the basis of academic misconduct detection system. Give full play to the role of experts and the academic community, coordinate to deal with academic misconduct, and jointly build a scientific research integrity system. |
|
View Fulltext
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
