文章摘要
科技期刊公开发表专家审稿意见的方法及意义
Method and significance of publishing expert review opinions in scientific and technical periodicals
投稿时间:2022-07-29  修订日期:2022-09-03
DOI:
中文关键词: 审稿意见  发表  盲法审稿  开放式同行评议
英文关键词: review comments  publish  blind review  open peer review
基金项目:
作者单位邮编
吴爱华 四川大学华西口腔医学院编辑部 610041
王姝 四川大学华西口腔医学院编辑部 610041
摘要点击次数: 29
全文下载次数: 0
中文摘要:
      专家审稿意见是科技期刊在同行评议过程中学术价值最高的部分,具有发表价值,但在目前多数科技期刊普遍实行的盲法审稿方式下,审稿意见只在专家、编辑和作者之间传递,造成学术资源的巨大浪费。目前的同行评议方式向着更多元、更公开的方向发展,公开发表专家审稿意见可以作为实施开放式同行评议的尝试和突破,具有可行性和实践意义。本文建议采取先“精选”后“普及”、逐步推进的审稿意见发表方式,总结出精选审稿意见的遴选标准和程序,讨论了公开发表专家审稿意见对编辑工作的意义,以期为促进同行评议模式的转变,实施开放式同行评议打下基础。
英文摘要:
      Expert review opinions are the most valuable part of scientific and technical periodicals in the process of peer review. The review opinions are only transmitted among experts, editors and authors in the blind review, which resulting in a huge waste of academic resources. At present, the peer review method is developing towards more diversity and openness. The public release of expert review opinions can be used as an attempt and breakthrough in the implementation of open peer review. This paper suggests that we can first select and publish the excellent review opinions, then gradually popularize and promote them, and finally publish all the review opinions. This paper also summarizes the selection criteria and procedures of selected review opinions, and discusses the significance of publishing expert review opinions to the editorial work. This method can promote the transformation of peer review mode. It can lay a foundation for the implementation of open peer review in the future.
View Fulltext   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭