|
| 科技期刊编辑部在科研失信行为查处中的程序地位 ——基于《科研失信行为调查处理规则》的讨论 |
| Research on the Procedural Issues of Investigating and Handling Scientific Research Misconduct by the Editorial Board of Scientific and Technological Journals: based on the Rules for Investigation and Handling of Scientific Research Breach of Trust |
| 投稿时间：2022-11-11 修订日期：2023-05-22 |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 科技期刊编辑部 科研诚信 科研失信行为 查处程序 |
| 英文关键词: scientific and technical journal editorial board research integrity research breach of trust investigation and punishment procedures |
| 基金项目:中央高校基本科研业务费专项基金资助项目（2019SSYB01）；国家自然科学基金项目（S2024003） |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 30 |
| 全文下载次数: 0 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 《科研失信行为调查处理规则》出台后，针对科技期刊编辑部如何查处科研失信行为的程序问题研究，仍处于空白的状态。本文以《规则》为分析基点，以查处程序为分析脉络，剖析了科技期刊编辑部查处科研失信行为的公正、秩序和效益价值，并展现了其查处科研失信行为所面临的规范依据不足，主体责任意识缺乏，查处体系混乱的程序困境。最终通过对《规则》的法教义学分析，实现了以前置程序、调查程序、处理程序及救济程序为内容的程序建构。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| After the introduction of the Rules for Investigation and Handling of Scientific Research Misconduct, the research on the procedural issues of how to investigate and handle scientific research misconduct by the editorial board of scientific journals is still in a blank state. This paper takes the Rules as the analytical base and the investigation and handling procedures as the analytical vein, analyzes the justice, order and benefit values of the scientific journal editorial department in investigating and handling scientific research breach of trust, and shows the procedural dilemmas faced by its investigation and handling of scientific research breach of trust in terms of insufficient normative basis, lack of awareness of subject responsibility and confusion of the investigation and handling system. Finally, through the legal doctrinal analysis of the Rules, a procedural construction with the content of antecedent procedures, investigation procedures, treatment procedures and relief procedures is realized. |
|
View Fulltext
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
