|
| 高质量审稿意见的特点及其刊登的现状与价值 |
| Characteristics of high-quality review opinions and the status and value of their publication |
| 投稿时间：2023-02-11 修订日期：2023-03-28 |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 高质量审稿意见 退修意见 退稿意见 审稿人 学术期刊 |
| 英文关键词: High-quality review comments Rejection opinions Rejection comments Reviewer Academic journals |
| 基金项目:广东省高校学报研究会编辑学项目(20180305)；国家社科基金2021年度一般项目“重大突发事件的应急出版与学术媒体动员机制研究”成果(21BXW085) |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 61 |
| 全文下载次数: 0 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 高质量审稿意见不仅言之有据,对稿件全面客观评价,而且还提出富有建设性的修改建议,具有很高的学术价值。高质量审稿意见分类,从目前已刊发的情况看,按内容可分为珍贵史料型、学术争鸣型和学习借鉴型三种类型,按刊登载体模式可分为纸质刊物刊登型、纯网络版刊发型、审稿专家个人微信公众号推送型三种主要形式。选登高质量的审稿意见有利于组建和培养优秀审稿人队伍,有利于优质学术资源的共享与示范,有利于学术期刊的诚信建设。学术期刊可普及和推广高质量审稿意见选登,科研单位可将选登的高质量审稿意见纳入审稿人的工作业绩,全面推动学术期刊和科研工作的繁荣发展。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| High-quality review opinions are not only well-founded,Make a comprehensive and objective evaluation of the manuscript, And put forward constructive suggestions for modification, It has high academic value. Classification of high-quality review comments, According to the current published situation, According to the content, it can be divided into three types: precious historical data type, academic contention type and learning reference type, According to the publication carrier mode, it can be divided into three main forms: paper publication type, pure online publication type, and review expert personal WeChat official account push type. Selecting high-quality review opinions is conducive to the formation and training of excellent reviewers, It is conducive to the sharing and demonstration of high-quality academic resources, It is conducive to the integrity construction of academic journals. Academic journals can popularize and promote the selection of high-quality review opinions, Scientific research institutions can incorporate selected high-quality review comments into the work performance of reviewers, We will comprehensively promote the prosperity and development of academic journals and scientific research. |
|
View Fulltext
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|
