|
| 撤稿论文引用异常增加现象剖析及治理建议——基于“维克菲尔德撤稿事件”的考察 |
| Analysis of the phenomenon of abnormal increase in citation of retracted papers and suggestions for governance: the case of Wakefield’s retraction paper |
| 投稿时间：2023-02-28 修订日期：2023-05-30 |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 撤稿论文 引用 学术伦理 科技期刊 |
| 英文关键词: retracted papers citation academic ethics academic journal |
| 基金项目:国家自然科学基金项目“基于交互记忆系统的在线社交网络应急管理传播建模及其神经机制研究”（71573241）；中国科协2022年度研究生科普能力提升项目“伦理风险型技术的科普解读与社会感知研究——以人工智能医疗技术为例”（KXYJS2022070） |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 51 |
| 全文下载次数: 0 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 撤稿论文引用异常增加现状是科研伦理治理的新问题,对此进行深入研究有助于探寻引用不降反增的原因及治理对策。以科学与社会领域著名的安德鲁.维克菲尔德Lancet杂志撤稿事件为例,通过科学计量学方法,分析撤稿论文在未撤稿、部分撤稿、完全撤稿阶段的时间分布特征、空间分布特征、施引文献影响和施引文献引用态度。研究发现,维克菲尔德的论文存在撤稿后引用异常增加现象,高达81.55%的引文发表部分或全部撤稿之后,并在语种和国家层面呈现扩散态势,施引文献产生了巨大的影响力。应辩证看待撤稿论文引用价值,并从作者、数据库、期刊编辑部和学界角度提出治理建议。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| The current situation of abnormal increase in citation of retracted papers is a new issue in the governance of scientific ethics, and an in-depth study of this issue can help to explore the reasons for the increase in citation instead of decrease and the countermeasures of governance. Taking the Andrew Wakefield’s Lancet retraction paper (1998) as an example, this paper analyzed the characteristics of temporal distribution, spatial distribution, influence of cited literature and citation attitude of cited literature of retracted papers at the stages of non-retracted, partially retracted and completely retracted papers by scientometric methods. There is an abnormal increase of citation after retraction in Wakefield"s paper, and up to 81.55% of citations are published after partial or full retraction, and show a diffusion trend at language and country levels, and the cited literature has a great influence. The citation value of retracted papers should be viewed dialectically, and suggestions for its governance should be made from the perspectives of authors, databases, journal editorial boards, and the academic community. |
|
View Fulltext
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|
