|
| 英文科技期刊“编委编辑协同处理稿件”模式的实践与思考——以《鸟类学研究(英文)》为例 |
| Practice of an “editor-board member collaborative mode” to handle manuscripts for English sci-tech journals: A case study of Avian Research // CHENG Pengjun, ZHANG Tieming |
| 投稿时间：2023-02-28 修订日期：2023-04-04 |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 英文科技期刊 编委 编辑 审稿流程 协同处理稿件 |
| 英文关键词: English sci-tech journal peer-review process peer reviewer collaboration |
| 基金项目:中国科技期刊卓越行动计划“梯队期刊”（项目编号：C-082） |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 66 |
| 全文下载次数: 0 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 如何加快审稿流程是科技期刊编辑关注的重要问题。而部分学科领域的英文科技期刊在寻找合适的审稿人环节花费的时间较多，已成为制约期刊发展的一个因素。本文提出了“编委编辑协同处理稿件”模式（简称“协同模式”），并结合《Avian Research》[鸟类学研究（英文）]的实践，详细介绍了期刊在“协同模式”下，编辑如何在编委工作时间受限的特定时期与编委密切配合，采取便捷方式协助编委快速了解稿件情况、寻找合适的审稿人以加快审稿流程，提升审稿质量，同时指出了“协同模式”下需体现编委学术把关作用、降低拒审率等注意事项，为面临类似问题的期刊提供参考。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| How to accelerate the article handling process is a key issue for sci-tech journals. Some English journals in specific disciplines are facing the difficulty of finding suitable peer reviewers timely, which has become a constraint for the journal development. This paper, taking Avian Research, an English journal of ornithology as an example, introduces how the editorial office adopts an “editor-board member collaborative mode” and assists the board members to seek proper peer reviewers in a much quicker way during the period when the board members have limited time and access to the online article-handling system, so as to accelerate the review process. By applying this mode, the review process of Avian Research has been accelerated considerably, and review quality has also been improved. The paper also points out that under this mode editors should defend the board members’ role in safeguarding manuscript quality and try to reduce the proportion of rejecting review invitations by potential reviewers. The practice will provide reference for journals that have the same quandary. |
|
View Fulltext
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
