|
| 综合性科技期刊与学会合作出版专题的实践 ——以《科技导报》为例 |
| Practice of collaborative publication of special topics between comprehensive science and technology journals and societies: taking Science and Technology Review as an example |
| 投稿时间：2023-12-18 修订日期：2024-03-29 |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 学会 综合性科技期刊 专题 交叉学科 |
| 英文关键词: association ? comprehensive scientific and technological journals special topic interdisciplinarity |
| 基金项目: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 8 |
| 全文下载次数: 0 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 合作出版专题是科技期刊与学术组织之间实现有效联动的有效途径之一。根据《科技导报》的出版实践,综合性科技期刊与学会的合作可以分为依托学会理事会或秘书处、依托学会分支机构、依托学会举办的学术会议3种类型。具体的协同合作模式体现在确定合作专题的方向、制定详细的出版方案、组织高质量的评审及拓展多元化的宣传渠道4个方面。通过与学会的合作出版专题,使《科技导报》服务学科发展的能力持续提升,社会效益得到充分发挥,知名度也得到显著增强。对2016—2022年间《科技导报》出版的22个合作专题及148个非合作专题的文章引证数据的分析结果显示,合作专题的学术指标整体上并未得到显著提升,各合作专题的引证数据之间存在明显的差异性:相较于其他两类合作类型,依托学会举办的学术活动的合作专题效果不佳；围绕国家重大战略所涉及的交叉学科合作的专题效果显著,而围绕细化的学科领域合作的专题效果较差。建议综合性科技期刊本着宁缺毋滥的原则,重点围绕国家重大战略涉及的交叉学科,深入挖掘其中的关键科学问题,找准与学会的共同目标和合作的契合点,以问题为导向,有组织地策划优质专题。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Collaborative publishing of special topics is one of the effective ways for technology journals and academic organizations to achieve effective synergies. Based on the publishing practice of Science Technology Review, collaborations between comprehensive technology journals and learned societies can be categorized into three types: relying on the society"s council or secretariat, relying on the society"s branches, and relying on academic conferences organized by the society. The specific collaborative models are manifested in four aspects: determining the direction of the collaborative topic, developing detailed publication plans, organizing high-quality reviews, and expanding diversified promotion channels. Through collaborative publishing of special topics with learned societies, the ability of Science Technology Review to serve disciplinary development has been continuously enhanced, its social benefits have been fully leveraged, and its visibility has been significantly increased. The analysis of the citation data of 22 collaborative topics and 148 non-collaborative topics published in the Science and Technology Review from 2016 to 2022 shows that the academic indicators of collaborative topics have not been significantly improved overall, and there are significant differences in the citation data of each collaborative topic. Compared with the other two types of collaboration, the collaborative topics relying on academic activities held by learned societies have poor results. The collaborative topics focusing on the cross-disciplinary cooperation involved in major national strategies have significant effects, while the collaborative topics focusing on the detailed disciplinary fields have poor results. It is recommended that comprehensive technology journals, following the principle of quality over quantity, prioritize interdisciplinary areas involving national major strategies, deeply explore the key scientific issues within them, identify common goals and points of convergence with learned societies, and organize high-quality special topics in a problem-oriented and structured manner. |
|
View Fulltext
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|
