|
| 我国中文医学科技期刊指南与共识报告质量评价及规范化建设研究 |
| Reporting quality and standardization of clinical practice guidelines and expert consensus statements in Chinese medical journals: an evaluation and improvement study // LI Yule,LIU Hui,LI Huiwen,LI Na,LIU Bing,LIU Yang,YANG Shuang,CHEN Yaolong |
| 投稿时间：2025-12-11 修订日期：2026-02-02 |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 临床实践指南 专家共识 质量评价 报告规范 调研 医学科技期刊 |
| 英文关键词: clinical practice guidelines expert consensus statements quality evaluation reporting specification investigate and survey Chinese medical science technology journals |
| 基金项目:中国科学技术期刊编辑学会2023年度“翰笔计划医学中青年编辑”科研项目（HBJH-2023-A03） |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 207 |
| 全文下载次数: 0 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 本研究综合运用文献分析、质量评价、问卷调查及网站调研等方法,系统评估我国中文医学科技期刊指南与共识的报告质量及规范化建设现状,深入剖析其存在的主要问题与薄弱环节,并探索改进建议与优化策略,以期进一步提升我国指南与共识报告质量,推动医学科技期刊高质量发展。研究发现,我国中文医学科技期刊指南与共识的报告质量整体偏低,尤其在评审与质量保证流程、利益冲突声明管理、证据来源与评价报告等关键环节存在显著不足。调查显示,65.08% 的中文医学科技期刊缺乏指南与共识报告规范的相关制度,79.37% 的中文医学科技期刊编辑未曾接受过相关报告规范的培训,96.46% 的期刊未在其官网稿约及投稿须知中对指南与共识的撰写作出明确要求。基于上述发现,建议期刊出版单位应加快完善相关制度建设,将国际通用的报告规范明确纳入期刊投稿指南；期刊编辑应主动加强相关方法论学习,并积极投身于指南与共识的制订实践；同时,应开展面向编辑、作者及审稿人的系统化培训,构建多方协同的质量提升机制,共同推动我国指南与共识在规范性、科学性与透明度方面的整体进步。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| This study employed a comprehensive approach, including literature analysis, quality assessment, questionnaire surveys, and website investigations, to systematically evaluate the reporting quality and normative development of guidelines and consensus statements published in Chinese medical scientific journals. It further examined the main existing problems and weaknesses, and explored recommendations and optimization strategies to improve the reporting quality of guidelines and consensus statements and promote the high-quality development of medical scientific journals in China. The findings indicate that the overall reporting quality of guidelines and consensus statements in Chinese medical scientific journals remains relatively low, with notable deficiencies in key areas such as review and quality assurance processes, management of conflicts of interest, and reporting of evidence sources and evaluations. The survey revealed that 65.08% of Chinese medical scientific journals lack institutional policies regarding reporting standards for guidelines and consensus statements, 79.37% of editors have not received training related to such reporting standards, and 96.46% of journals do not provide explicit requirements for the preparation of guidelines and consensus statements in their official author guidelines or submission instructions. Based on these findings, it is recommended that journal publishers accelerate the improvement of relevant institutional frameworks by explicitly incorporating internationally recognized reporting standards into journal submission guidelines. Editors should proactively enhance their methodological knowledge and actively participate in the development of guidelines and consensus statements. Furthermore, systematic training should be provided for editors, authors, and reviewers to establish a multi-stakeholder collaborative mechanism for quality improvement, thereby collectively advancing the standardization, scientific rigor, and transparency of guidelines and consensus statements in China. |
|
View Fulltext
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|
|
|
