| 王昕,王有登,骆瑾.编辑流程中对专家审稿意见的分析、反馈与核查.编辑学报,2008,20(1):22-24 |
| 编辑流程中对专家审稿意见的分析、反馈与核查 |
| Analyses, feedback and check on the comments of peer review in editing process |
| 投稿时间：2007-04-06 修订日期：2007-04-06 |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 专家审稿 审稿意见 反馈 复审 |
| 英文关键词: peer review review comment feedback |
| 基金项目: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 1037 |
| 全文下载次数: 1003 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 由于专家审稿意见所具有的评价鉴定与优化完善功能,以及 审稿意见本身的多样性和涉及内容的广泛性,使得对专家审稿意见的落实贯穿于编辑流程的 各个环节,不同环节有不同侧重点:定稿过程重仔细分析审稿意见；文稿加工过程重认真反 馈审稿意见；复审文稿过程重跟踪核查作者对审稿意见的答复与处理情况。认为:通过分析 、反馈、核查,使专家审稿意见真正落实到文稿中,以增强审稿信息的利用率,从而达到提 高文稿质量和刊物质量的目的；强化编辑学术意识、发挥编辑主动性是保证这一过程得以实 现的前提。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Because the comments of peer review have the functions of appraisal and optimization for the manuscripts, and the comments themselves are diversified and related to various fields, therefore the comments should be applied at all the stages of editing. At different stages the applications have different focuses:while determining to accept or reject the manuscripts the comments should be carefully analyzed; in the process of copy editing the comments should be sent back to the authors; at the stage of reviewing on the revised version the authors' responses to the comments should be checked. Through the analyses, feedback and check the comments of peer review can be used to improve the quality of both the papers and the journals. The preconditions for realizing these are to strengthen the editors' academic consciousness and to bring the editors' active roles into full play. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|
