| 周洁,王昕.科技编辑与作者间的矛盾及其化解.编辑学报,2010,22(1):10-12 |
| 科技编辑与作者间的矛盾及其化解 |
| Forms and solutions of contradictions between sci-tech editors and authors |
| 投稿时间：2009-06-09 修订日期：2009-06-09 |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 科技编辑 作者 矛盾 博弈 对立统一 沟通 |
| 英文关键词: sci-tech editor author contradiction game unity of opposites communication |
| 基金项目: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 898 |
| 全文下载次数: 802 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 科技编辑和作者始终处于矛盾的对立统一中。审稿过程中,稿件的采用与否往往是矛盾的焦点,录用稿件能否尽快刊登是矛盾的另一表现形式；编稿过程中,作者与科技编辑在作者专才与编辑通才、行业习惯与编辑规范、内容完整与信息冗余等方面存在矛盾。分析矛盾的特点及产生根源,进而发现编辑和作者二者的共同目的均是高质量科技论文更好地出版,矛盾的产生、消除恰恰促进这一过程的发展。从充分尊重作者、重视沟通技巧、积极运用新技术、提高编稿能力、增强专业素质等5个方面给出解决矛盾的突破口。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| In the editing system, there are contradictions of the unity of opposites between sci-tech editors and authors consistently. In review process, whether the manuscripts can be accepted, and whether the manuscripts will to be published earlier are the contradictions. In editing process, authors and sci-tech editors have contradictions in the aspects of professional vs. generalist, industry practice vs. editorial norms, and complete content vs. information redundancy. Analyzing these contradictions' features and reasons, it can be seen that the common purpose of sci-tech editors and authors is that high-quality scientific papers can been published better and earlier. The generation and elimination of the contradictions precisely promote to achieve this purpose. At last, breakthroughs to resolve the contradictions are proposed as fully respecting authors, attaching importance to communication skills, positively using new technologies, enhancing the ability of editing manuscripts, and reinforcing the professional quality. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|
