| 刘清海,吴秋玲,朱佩玲,张楚民.SCI收录中日韩印4国期刊引文指标的比较.编辑学报,2010,22(1):82-84 |
| SCI收录中日韩印4国期刊引文指标的比较 |
| Comparison of journal's citation indexes of China, Japan, Korea and India included in SCI |
| 投稿时间：2009-08-21 修订日期：2009-08-21 |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: SCI收录期刊 JCR 引文指标 国际比较 |
| 英文关键词: journals included in SCI journal citation index citation index international comparison |
| 基金项目: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 1020 |
| 全文下载次数: 901 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 以JCR2006—2008年的数据为基础,将我国与日本、韩国、印度的各项指标作比较,结果表明我国内地被SCI收录的期刊与论文在数量和质量方面都呈快速增长态势,虽与欧美有较大差距,但在亚洲明显超过印度,部分指标超过了我国台湾与韩国,仅次于日本。这启示我们:不必妄自菲薄,认为我国期刊质量都不如国外；当然,也要看到差距,努力争取更大的国际影响。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Based on the data from JCR 2006-2008, we compared the journal citation indexes of China, Japan, Korea, and India, and concluded that the number and quality of journals of China mainland cited by SCI are increasing rapidly, though they are trailing behind European and American journals. They overrun India, and exceed Korea and Taiwan of China in some indexes, are only inferior to Japan in Asia. So we should not improperly belittle ourselves, think that our journals are not as good as journals abroad. Of course, we should see our shortcomings, and make our great efforts to increase our journals' quality and to propagandize our journals, strive for more extensive international influence. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|
