| 黄政,郝希春.关于科技期刊编辑质量考核的思考.编辑学报,2011,23(4):291-293 |
| 关于科技期刊编辑质量考核的思考 |
| Thinking of assessment of editing quality of scientific journals |
| 投稿时间：2010-12-10 修订日期：2010-12-10 |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 科技期刊 编辑质量 考核 学者编辑化 编辑学者化 科学引文索引 |
| 英文关键词: scientific journal scientific paper editing quality assessment "scientists to be editors" "editors to be scientists" Science Citation Index |
| 基金项目: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 988 |
| 全文下载次数: 777 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 科技期刊编辑质量直接影响刊物的整体质量。而在考核科技期刊的编辑质量时,SCI情结很易导致原本客观公正的评价指标失去其实际评价功能和意义。正因为科技期刊编辑的贡献更多地表现为隐性成绩,对特殊性和复杂性极为明显的科技期刊编辑质量考评在理论上和实践中都有待不断深化。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| The editing quality directly affects the overall quality of scientific journals. The quality of editors and the quality of papers in the journals are golden standards for the assessment. Therefore, publishing high quality journals requires scientists to become editors. In assessing the editing quality of scientific journals, the motivation of being indexed in SCI will easily make the originally objective and fair assessment indicators lose their practical functions. Because in many cases the contribution of the editors looks like some recessive achievements, so for the editing quality of scientific journals which is very particular and complicated, its assessment needs more theoretical studies and real practices. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
