程红,李莉.学术期刊正交试验类稿件的审读方法.编辑学报,2012,24(5):450-452 |
学术期刊正交试验类稿件的审读方法 |
Reviewing methods for manuscripts about orthogonal tests in academic journals |
投稿时间:2012-03-17 修订日期:2012-03-17 |
DOI: |
中文关键词: 科技论文 正交试验 稿件审读 |
英文关键词: sci-tech paper orthogonal test review academic quality |
基金项目: |
|
摘要点击次数: 2119 |
全文下载次数: 2210 |
中文摘要: |
以农林类A+和A类期刊题名或 |
英文摘要: |
Academic papers focusing on orthogonal tests (experiments) in agriculture and forestry are surveyed and analyzed statistically based on the orthogonal test (experiment) theory. The results show that the papers with wrong expression of orthogonal marks account for 20.29% of the total surveyed papers, wrong k values for 28.77%, wrong R values for 27.97%, wrong arrangements in a primary order for 17.01%, and wrong combinations for 26.80%. The variance analysis among factors is confirmed to be insignificant in 31.86% papers. All these mistakes finally result in 63.13% papers with wrong conclusions or failed test design, suggesting that the academic quality of papers regarding orthogonal tests is worrying. Some proofreading methods for recognizing and revising these mistakes are provided from the editor's perspective. Meanwhile, journal publishing departments should strengthen the preliminary review of such kind of papers. |
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
关闭 |
|
|
|