| 丁佐奇,郑晓南.作者推荐审稿人审稿结果的分析与思考.编辑学报,2013,25(5):458-459 |
| 作者推荐审稿人审稿结果的分析与思考 |
| Experience and suggestions in selecting peer reviewers recommended by authors |
| 投稿时间：2013-02-27 修订日期：2013-02-27 |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 审稿专家 作者推荐 利益冲突 对策 |
| 英文关键词: peer reviewers author recommending conflict interest strategy |
| 基金项目: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 989 |
| 全文下载次数: 769 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 通过对《中国天然药物》200篇稿件的同行评议结果的分析,发现作者推荐审稿人较少能做到客观评价,存在较严重利益冲突问题。据此,提出相关的建议:在投稿须知中对推荐审稿人以及审稿的注意事项作出要求；注意作者与推荐审稿人之间的利益关系；选择推荐审稿人的同时最好再选2位其他审稿人；用推荐的审稿人审其他相关文章；建立完善的申诉机制和反馈机制。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| On the basis of analyzing the peer review results from a total of 200 manuscripts of Chinese Journal of Natural Medicines, we found that the peer reviewers recommended by authors often could not make objective comments for which the potential conflict of interest is an important concern. Thus we propose several suggestions in the selection of peer reviewers recommended by authors. We suggest that it is necessary to provide detailed guideline for authors' recommendation of referees and manuscript reviews in the journal. Editors should care about the potential conflict relationship between reviewers and authors. Editors may select two reviewers in addition to those recommended by authors, and select the recommended reviewers to evaluate other manuscripts. Editorial department should also set up perfect mechanisms of appealing and feedback. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|
