文章摘要
白娅娜.《洁净煤技术》稿件退修未回的对策.编辑学报,2014,26(4):351-353
《洁净煤技术》稿件退修未回的对策
Measures against revised manuscripts not returned to Clean Coal Technology
投稿时间:2014-02-19  修订日期:2014-02-19
DOI:
中文关键词: 稿件退修未回  审稿周期  催修机制  一稿多投  网络办公  《洁净煤技术》
英文关键词: revised manuscripts not returned  review period  mechanism of urging revision  duplicate submission  network office  Clean Coal Technology
基金项目:
作者单位
白娅娜 煤炭科学研究总院《洁净煤技术》编辑部,100013,北京 
摘要点击次数: 186
全文下载次数: 82
中文摘要:
      通过统计《洁净煤技术》2010—2012年退修超过半年未回稿件的情况,说明作者无法修改、不满意刊用栏目、稿件处理周期过长、转投他刊或一稿多投、作者忘记修回或无法联系,是造成稿件超期未修回的主要原因。通过认真送审,缩短审稿周期;了解作者,做到因人而异;发挥专业优势,发掘文章新意;仔细检查修回稿,适当使用修改权等措施从主观上促进了编辑主动性的充分发挥。通过明确修稿时间,建立催修机制;借助技术手段,防止一稿多投;开展网络办公,优化编辑流程等措施从客观上完善了编辑部的稿件退修流程。通过以上措施,2013年《洁净煤技术》稿件修回率达到98%,提高了工作效率,实现了期刊质量的稳步提升。
英文摘要:
      Through analyzing revised manuscripts not returned to Clean Coal Technology for more than half a year in 2010-2012, it is found that there are several causes to this phenomenon:authors are not able to revise the manuscripts as per the comments, they are not content with the column, manuscript processing period is too long, they have duplicate submission or have other target journals, they forget to modify or are out of touch. It is suggested that several means, such as careful selection of reviewers, understanding authors, excavating new ideas of papers and appropriate use of right of revision can give editors' initiatives into full play. By clarifying time of manuscripts revision, developing mechanism of urging revision and network office, preventing duplicate submission, the manuscripts revision process will be perfected. By above means, the return rate of revised manuscripts in 2013 was up to 98%, and editorial department had a better development.
查看全文   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭