| 詹燕平,游滨,陈移峰,侯湘.论科技期刊审稿专家的选择与管理及其审稿积极性的调动.编辑学报,2014,26(6):572-573 |
| 论科技期刊审稿专家的选择与管理及其审稿积极性的调动 |
| Selection,management and arousing enthusiasm of reviewers in academic journals |
| 投稿时间：2014-04-25 修订日期：2014-04-25 |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 科技期刊 审稿专家 学术质量 |
| 英文关键词: sci-tech journal peer reviewers academic quality |
| 基金项目:2013年重庆市高校期刊研究会重点资助项目(CQXK201311) |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 958 |
| 全文下载次数: 798 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 欲打造精品期刊,必须多元化选取合适的审稿专家,加强审稿专家队伍的管理,增强编辑与审稿专家的协作。加强与审稿专家的沟通,提高其审稿责任心。利用审稿专家的专业优势组约稿件,采取激励措施提高他们的积极性。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Peer review process in sci-tech journal publishing is an important task to editorial departments, which determines the academic quality of the journals. Editors should diversify the selection of reviewers, strengthen the management of peer reviewers, and enhance the collaboration between editors and peer reviewers. Also, they should communicate timely with peer reviewers and strengthen their sense of responsibility, give full play to the positive effects of their journals, and take appropriate incentives to improve their enthusiasm. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|
