| 廖文婷,张普.论提高学术期刊专家审稿质量的途径.编辑学报,2014,26(6):574-575 |
| 论提高学术期刊专家审稿质量的途径 |
| Ways to improve the quality of peer review of academic journals |
| 投稿时间：2014-04-10 修订日期：2014-04-10 |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 学术期刊 专家评审 质量 |
| 英文关键词: academic journal peer review quality |
| 基金项目:湖南省教育厅资助项目(湘教通[2008]169) |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 1471 |
| 全文下载次数: 849 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 质量是学术期刊赖以生存和发展的前提,而稿件的专家评审是保障期刊学术质量的重要环节；但在实际操作中却因为各种原因导致审稿达不到预期的效果。为了提高专家评审的质量,应从建立并完善审稿专家库、科学合理地设计审稿单、扩大稿件送审范围、构建审稿质量评价体系、提升专家对期刊单位的认同感和归属感等方面来保障期刊的质量。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Quality is the prerequisite for the survival and development of academic journals, and the articles' peer review is an important part to ensure the academic quality of journals； however, in actual operation, the peer review could not reach the expected effect due to various reasons. In order to improve the quality of peer review, we should establish and perfect the expert database, scientific design review form, expand review scope, construct review quality evaluation system, and enhance the experts' sense of identity and sense of belonging to the journal publishing department in order to ensure the quality of the journals. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|
