| 马秋明,窦春蕊,李小平,屈李纯,温晓平.科技期刊责任编辑应慎重对待通读编辑的修改和疑问.编辑学报,2015,27(4):351-353 |
| 科技期刊责任编辑应慎重对待通读编辑的修改和疑问 |
| Executive editors of sci-tech periodicals should seriously treat proofreading editors' revisions and questions |
| 投稿时间：2014-11-10 修订日期：2014-11-10 |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 责任编辑 通读编辑 通读 校样 |
| 英文关键词: executive editor proofreading editor proofreading proof |
| 基金项目: |
| 作者 | 单位 | | 马秋明 | 《西北农林科技大学学报自然科学版》编辑部,712100,陕西杨凌 | | 窦春蕊 | 《西北农林科技大学学报自然科学版》编辑部,712100,陕西杨凌 | | 李小平 | 《西北农林科技大学学报自然科学版》编辑部,712100,陕西杨凌 | | 屈李纯 | 《西北农林科技大学学报自然科学版》编辑部,712100,陕西杨凌 | | 温晓平 | 《西北农林科技大学学报自然科学版》编辑部,712100,陕西杨凌 |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 1053 |
| 全文下载次数: 992 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 结合编校工作实践,对责任编辑在处理通读编辑的修改、疑问时应秉持的态度和注意的问题进行了讨论。认为:责任编辑在处理通读编辑修改的文稿时,要认真严谨,仔细甄别,尊重而不盲从；在处理通读编辑的疑问时,不可草率,应“勤”字当头,认真核查补缺。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Based on the editing practice, the authors discuss the attitude and problems that the executive editors should pay attention to during treating the revisions and questions of proofreading editors. The paper suggests that the executive editors should treat and distinguish proofreading eiditors' revisions carefully and seriously, respect their comments but not follow blindly. In addition, the executive editors should also pay more efforts to examine and fill up the missing points when they are dealing with the questions of proofreading editors. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|
