文章摘要
张宏,赵丽莹,李航,杜燕.编辑应能协调作者与审稿专家的不同意见.编辑学报,2016,28(2):139-141
编辑应能协调作者与审稿专家的不同意见
Discussion on editors’ methods to process different opinions between authors and reviewers
投稿时间:2015-11-12  修订日期:2015-11-12
DOI:
中文关键词: 科技期刊  编辑  审稿专家  作者  评审意见
英文关键词: sci-tech periodical  editor  reviewer  author  peer reviewers’ comments
基金项目:中国高校科技期刊研究会基金资助项目(GBJXC1138);哈尔滨工业大学校级研究生教育教改研究项目
作者单位
张宏 《哈尔滨工业大学学报》编辑部 
赵丽莹 《哈尔滨工业大学学报》编辑部 
李航 《哈尔滨金融学院学报》编辑部 
杜燕 哈尔滨工业大学出版社:150001,哈尔滨 
摘要点击次数: 966
全文下载次数: 1389
中文摘要:
      从作者、审稿专家和编辑三者关系入手,分析三者的态度对论文取舍的决定性作用。将评审专家意见进行分类,并根据作者修改论文时对专家意见的不同回应态度,分析、总结其对论文的审稿结果所带来的影响。为此提出编辑的应对策略,并以一实例进行验证。认为编辑的正确应对既能平衡作者与审稿专家之间的分歧,又能提升作者的论文撰写能力。这为提高科技期刊的影响力,进一步吸引到更多、更高水平的论文打下基础。
英文摘要:
      In this paper, the relationship among authors, peer reviewers and journal editors is discussed, and the importance of their attitudes to the manuscript is analyzed. To one paper, the peer reviewers’ different conclusions, and the authors’ different responses to the peer reviewers’ comments are all classified, and then their influence on the manuscript is analyzed and summarized. Finally, the editors’ response strategies at the different situations are pointed out in order to balance the different views between the authors and peer reviewers, and an example is used to certify that the editor’s appropriate method not only can balance the relationship between the authors and the reviewers, but also can improve the authors’ writing ability. In the meantime it can expand the influence of sci-tech periodicals, and attract more high-quality scientific papers.
查看全文   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭