| 骆瑾,王昕.基于科学论证的科技论文初审探究.编辑学报,2016,28(3):224-225 |
| 基于科学论证的科技论文初审探究 |
| Initial review of scientific papers based on science argumentation |
| 投稿时间：2016-02-22 修订日期：2016-02-22 |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 科技论文 论证 三审制度 初审 |
| 英文关键词: scientific paper argumentation triditing system initial review |
| 基金项目:吉林省教育厅社会科学研究项目 |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 965 |
| 全文下载次数: 835 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 编辑初审作为三审制度的第一道关口,责任重大。科技期刊编辑对于各学科特点及科技论文论证方法、写作范式较为熟悉,本文认为应将这种编辑思维的优势融入初审过程中,从科技论文的写作范式入手并以科学论证为基础,从验证手段、方法对比、结果分析、结论的意义几个方面对来稿进行初审,考察论文的学术创新性。只有做好工作笔记,反复对比实践,才能获得更好的初审效果。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| As the first step of the triditing system, initial review is very important. Editors of scientific papers are familiar with the characteristics of each subject and the argumentation methods and writing paradigms of scientific papers. Integrating editorial thinking into the process of peer review, from the writing paradigm of scientific papers and based on the science argumentation, this paper presents manuscript reviewing form verification means, comparison of methods, result analysis and conclusion, and then investigates innovation of paper. Only if through taking good working notes and repeated practice, can we get better initial review results. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|
