| 陈志贤.科技期刊中替审行为及应对措施.编辑学报,2021,(2):179-181 |
| 科技期刊中替审行为及应对措施 |
| Substitution review behavior and countermeasures in scientific journals |
| |
| DOI：10.16811/j.cnki.1001-4314.2021.02.014 |
| 中文关键词: 审稿专家 替审行为 审稿伦理 小同行 审稿意见 |
| 英文关键词: reviewers substituting review behavior reviewer ethics research peers review comments |
| 基金项目:*福建省教育科学“十三五”规划2018年度立项课题“高校学术期刊与新媒体融合的发展研究”(FJJKCGZ18-815) |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 616 |
| 全文下载次数: 521 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 为了更好地防范替审行为给科技期刊带来的隐患,通过案例分析,认为替审行为主要是因为审稿专家缺乏审稿伦理:保密原则、信任关系、公正责任,并分析其危害。从出版的角度提出应对措施:事前联系沟通、邀请函明示并允许退审、提升选择准确性、事后评价以及向审稿人问责。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Based on case analysis, we think that substitution review behavior is mainly due to the lack of reviewer ethics such as confidentiality principle, trust relationship, fair responsibility. In order to better prevent the substituting review behaviors, we put forward some countermeasures from publishing perspective, such as contacting and communicating in advance, making clear in the invitation letters and allowing to be withdrawn, improving the accuracy of reviewer’s selection, evaluating reviewing process, and holding accountability to reviewers. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|
