文章摘要
陈嵩,安菲菲,张敏,谭蓉蓉.对完善我国科技期刊同行评议机制的思考.编辑学报,2022,(1):53-57
对完善我国科技期刊同行评议机制的思考
Thoughts on improving the peer review mechanism of scientific journals in China
  
DOI:10.16811/j.cnki.1001-4314.2022.01.011
中文关键词: 同行评议  审稿人  审稿质量  审稿效率  审稿尺度
英文关键词: peer review  reviewer  review quality  review efficiency  review standard
基金项目:
作者单位
陈嵩 天然气工业杂志社,610051,成都 
安菲菲 天然气工业杂志社,610051,成都 
张敏 天然气工业杂志社,610051,成都 
谭蓉蓉 天然气工业杂志社,610051,成都 
摘要点击次数: 399
全文下载次数: 485
中文摘要:
      在我国科技期刊办刊模式与国际接轨的过程中,完善同行评议机制是最容易实现的部分。在实际工作中,同行评议也已成为我国科技期刊保障学术品质的关键。为此,分析我国科技期刊完善同行评议机制中遇到的主要困惑和问题,包括:审稿人库建设不合理影响期刊审稿质量;审稿方式选择不恰当影响期刊审稿工作效率;审稿人选择不当影响论文刊出的效果;审稿尺度的不统一影响最终决策。结合《天然气工业》在“中国科技期刊卓越行动计划”实施期间的办刊实践,提出相关建议:1)塑造期刊品牌形象,明确自身定位;2)控制审稿人库规模,定期进行质量评估;3)根据来稿量灵活选择审稿方式;4)引导审稿人统一审稿尺度,维持审稿标准的一贯性。
英文摘要:
      In the process of China’s scientific journal running model in line with international standards, improving the peer review mechanism is the easiest part to achieve. In practice, peer review has also become a key guard to guarantee the academic quality of China’s scientific journals. Therefore, we analyze the main confusions and problems encountered in improving the peer review mechanism of China’s scientific journals, including:the unreasonable construction of the reviewer database affects the quality of journal review; the improper selection of peer review methods affects the efficiency of journal review work; inappropriate selection of reviewer affects the effect of the publication of the paper; the inconsistent review standard affects the final decision. Combined with the practice of Natural Gas Industry during the implementation of the “China Science and Technology Journal Excellence Action Plan”, this paper puts forward the following relevant suggestions:1)Shaping the brand image of the journal and clarifying its own positioning; 2)Controlling the size of the reviewer database and regularly conducting quality evaluations; 3)Flexible selection of review methods according to the amount of contributions; 4)Guide reviewers to unify the review standards and maintain the consistency of review standards.
查看全文   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭