| 何玉娟.科技期刊开展同行评议的实施举措和实操技巧——以《中国化学工程学报(英文版)》为例.编辑学报,2022,34(1):58-61 |
| 科技期刊开展同行评议的实施举措和实操技巧——以《中国化学工程学报(英文版)》为例 |
| Implementation measures and practical skills of peer review for scientific journals:taking Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering as an example |
| |
| DOI：10.16811/j.cnki.1001-4314.2022.01.012 |
| 中文关键词: 科技期刊 同行评议 学术质量 学术审查 |
| 英文关键词: scientific journals peer review academic quality academic review |
| 基金项目: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 421 |
| 全文下载次数: 649 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 浅析同行评议的重要性及其局限性,指出编辑在科技期刊同行评议环节中角色定位。基于《中国化学工程学报(英文版)》的办刊实践,阐述了同行评议期刊在建立和完善制度、调整办刊机制、重视专家队伍建设、加强审稿数据库建设以及搭建技术支撑平台并提供全面服务保障等方面的具体举措。最后,从专职编辑视角,列举稿件送审环节中的实操技巧,如明确审稿人遴选标准、多途径快速查找和选定审稿人、防范学术不端、关注审稿周期、注重人性化处理等,以期给学术期刊同行提供借鉴和参考。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| We analyze the importance and limitations of peer review, and point out the role of editors in the peer review process of scientific journals. Based on the practice of Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, we explained the specific measures for peer-reviewed journals, such as establishing and perfecting the system, adjusting the journal running mechanism, attaching importance to the construction of reviewer team, strengthening the construction of reviewer databases, and building technical support platforms to provide comprehensive services. Furthermore, from the perspective of editorial staff, we listed the practical skills of peer review, determining reviewers’ selection criteria, locating reviewers in multiple ways, preventing academic misconduct, paying attention to the review speed, handling review process humanized. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|
