| 舒安琴,张耀元,邹小勇,冷怀明,刘冰,贺柳,徐佳忆.2013—2019年101位中国科学院增选院士在国内外期刊发表论文情况统计分析.编辑学报,2022,(2):174-178 |
| 2013—2019年101位中国科学院增选院士在国内外期刊发表论文情况统计分析 |
| Analysis of publications of 101 additional academicians of the Chinese Academy of Sciences on domestic and foreign journals from 2013 to 2019 |
| |
| DOI：10.16811/j.cnki.1001-4314.2022.02.012 |
| 中文关键词: 中国科学院院士 科技工作者 发文特征 发文趋势 科技期刊 中国期刊 论文回流 |
| 英文关键词: academician of the Chinese academy of sciences scientific and technological workers characteristics of documents trend of document issuance sci-tech journals Chinese journal paper reflow |
| 基金项目:*重庆市科技期刊编辑学会2020年度科研项目研究课题(CQKJQKXH2020005) |
| 作者 | 单位 | | 舒安琴 | 重庆大学附属肿瘤医院中国药房编辑出版中心,400042,重庆 | | 张耀元 | 重庆市卫生健康统计信息中心,401120,重庆 | | 邹小勇 | 重庆大学附属肿瘤医院中国药房编辑出版中心,400042,重庆 | | 冷怀明 | 重庆大学附属肿瘤医院中国药房编辑出版中心,400042,重庆 | | 刘冰 | 中华医学会杂志社,100052,北京
医学期刊知识挖掘与服务重点实验室, 100052, 北京 | | 贺柳 | 重庆理工大学期刊社,400054,重庆 | | 徐佳忆 | 重庆理工大学期刊社,400054,重庆 |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 445 |
| 全文下载次数: 481 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 以中国科学院院士(以下简称“院士”)为研究对象,收集院士在中国知网和Scopus数据库发表论文(以下简称“发文”)的相关信息,并进行数据整理与分析。结果显示,院士在国内外期刊发文总体悬殊,但近3年来在国内期刊发文确实有所增加；院士发表由国家重大基金资助的文章较多,但在国内期刊上发表的研究型论文占比较少；国际权威刊物仍然是院士交流学术的主要平台,中国期刊吸引优质稿源的能力有待继续提高。提示中国科技期刊应该以吸引院士等科技工作者投稿为引领,带动其他专家学者将论文发表在祖国期刊上；在人才遴选、学术评估中更要注重在中国期刊发文的政策引导,才能从根本上提高中国期刊的学术影响力。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| We collected and analyzed relevant information of publications in home and abroad, retrieved from CNKI and Scopus from 2013 to 2019, authored by additional academicians of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (hereinafter referred to as “academicians”). The results showed that there is a wide gap in the number of publications between domestic and foreign journals. However, an increase in domestic publications was observed in recent three years. Most publications were funded by national key project, but only a small amount of research results were published in domestically. International authoritative journals remain the main platforms for academic communications among academicians, while the ability to attract high-quality manuscripts in Chinese journals needs to be further improved. It is suggested that Chinese sci-tech journals should focus on how to attract contributions from academicians in order to encourage other experts and scholars to publish their papers in Chinese journals. In talent selection and academic appraisal, we should advocate a more attention on domestic publications, so as to fundamentally improve the academic influence of Chinese journals. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|
