| 占莉娟,李牧,何婧,胡小洋,霍振响.学术期刊专家审稿进度控制的优化方法研究.编辑学报,2023,(1):66-71 |
| 学术期刊专家审稿进度控制的优化方法研究 |
| Shortening the time for peer review in academic journals |
| |
| DOI：10.16811/j.cnki.1001-4314.2023.01.013 |
| 中文关键词: 同行评议 学术期刊 审稿效率 审稿进度控制 审稿邀请 增审 审稿周期 |
| 英文关键词: peer review academic journals the efficiency of peer review schedule control for peer review the invitation for peer review additional peer review peer review time |
| 基金项目:*教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(21YJC860024)；中国科学院自然科学期刊编辑研究会项目(YJH202239)；ISTIC-Taylor ＆ Francis Group学术前沿观察联合实验室开放基金(IT2218)；湖北省教育科学规划课题(2021GB005) |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 109 |
| 全文下载次数: 579 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 同行评议时间控制应贯穿学术期刊专家审稿前、中、后全过程,而“审稿中”的时间控制是同行评议全程管理中易忽视的薄弱环节。对于该阶段的进度控制,编辑部可通过扩充专家邀请数量、提前设置增审、压缩增审周期来影响审稿进度。本文将围绕这3种方法调研其实施现状,以反映审稿进度控制现状并发现问题。结果显示,大多数期刊首次邀请专家人数仅等于要求回收意见的份数,审稿异常稿件需消耗1个审稿周期后才会被设置增审,审稿周期较长期刊的增审周期也未适当缩短,这些反映编辑部对处在“审稿中”稿件的时间管理处于近乎“虚空”的低干预状态。本文基于调研结果提出,期刊首次邀请专家人数宜大于要求回收意见份数但不是越多越好；分类确定提前增审对象及时间点；增审周期可控制在≤21 d；挖掘采编系统智能化辅助功能,减轻人力负担。多措并举,优化审稿进度控制效果,提升审稿运行效率,助力我国世界一流学术期刊建设。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Time control is a critical issue during the whole process of peer review, while that during the period of under-reviewing is mostly overlooked. There are several ways to solve this problem, such as inviting more peer reviewers than necessary, increasing peer-reviewers from the beginning and shortening the time for additional review. Here, we conducted surveys on the status quo of these methods. The results showed that the numbers of experts invited for the first time in most journals were equal to those of required comments, and some difficult manuscripts would be set for additional reviewers only after one review cycle. The time of additional review of some journals with long period of peer review was not reduced. All of the above lead to a state of low intervention during peer-review. Based on what we found, we proposed that the number of experts invited for the first time should be larger than the number of required comments, but not as many as possible. The list of experts and time for additional review should be determined and classified in advance. And the time of additional review could be reduced to three weeks or less. Make full use of artificial intelligence technology in manuscript management process to lighten the burden of editors. We should take multiple measures to optimize the time control of peer review, improve the efficiency of peer review and help to build world-class academic journals in China. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|
